dc.creatorGimenez Verotti, Cristiane Comeron
dc.creatorMatos de Miranda Torrinhas, Raquel Susana
dc.creatorCecconello, Ivan
dc.creatorWaitzberg, Dan Linetzky
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-06T16:30:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:19:05Z
dc.date.available2013-11-06T16:30:14Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:19:05Z
dc.date.created2013-11-06T16:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierNUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, THOUSAND OAKS, v. 27, n. 2, pp. 261-267, APR, 2012
dc.identifier0884-5336
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/42377
dc.identifier10.1177/0884533611432317
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0884533611432317
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1634306
dc.description.abstractBackground: The identification of useful quality indicators for nutrition therapy (QINTs) is of great interest and a challenge. This study attempted to identify the 10 QINTs that best suit the practice of quality control in nutrition therapy (NT) by evaluating the opinion of experts in NT with the use of psychometric techniques and statistical tools. Methods: Thirty-six QINTs available for clinical application in Brazil were assessed in 2 distinct phases. In phase 1, 26 nutrition experts ranked QINTs by scoring 4 attributes (utility, simplicity, objectivity, low cost) to assess each QINT on a 5-point Likert scale. The top 10 QINTs were identified from the 10 best scores obtained, and the reliability of expert opinion for each indicator was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. In phase 2, experts provided feedback regarding the selected top 10 QINTs by answering 2 closed questions. Results: The top 10 QINTs, in descending order, are the frequency of nutrition screening of hospitalized patients, diarrhea, involuntary withdrawal of enteral feeding tubes, feeding tube obstruction, fasting longer than 24 hours, glycemic dysfunction, estimated energy expenditure and protein needs, central venous catheter infection, compliance of NT indication, and frequency of application of subjective global assessment. Opinions were consistent among the interviewed experts. During feedback, 96% of experts were satisfied with the top 10 QINTs, and 100% had considered them in accordance with their previous opinion. Conclusion: The top 10 QINTs were identified according to their usefulness in clinical practice by obtaining adequate agreement and representativeness of opinion of nutrition experts. (Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27:261-267)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.publisherTHOUSAND OAKS
dc.relationNUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
dc.rightsCopyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectQUALITY INDICATORS
dc.subjectENTERAL NUTRITION
dc.subjectPARENTERAL NUTRITION
dc.subjectCRITICAL ILLNESS
dc.subjectQUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE
dc.subjectOUTCOME ASSESSMENT
dc.subjectBIOSTATISTICS
dc.titleSelection of Top 10 Quality Indicators for Nutrition Therapy
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución