Artículos de revistas
Abdominoperineal Excision: Evolution of a Centenary Operation
Fecha
2012Registro en:
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, PHILADELPHIA, v. 55, n. 8, supl. 1, Part 2, pp. 844-853, AUG, 2012
0012-3706
10.1097/DCR.0b013e31825ab0f7
Autor
Campos, Fabio Guilherme
Habr-Gama, Angelita
Nahas, Sergio Carlos
Perez, Rodrigo Oliva
Institución
Resumen
During the last century, great improvements have been made in rectal cancer management regarding preoperative staging, pathologic assessment, surgical technique, and multimodal therapies. Surgically, there was a move from a strategy characterized by simple perineal excision to complex procedures performed by means of a laparoscopic approach, and more recently with the aid of robotic systems. Perhaps the most important advance is that rectal cancer is no longer a fatal disease as it was at the beginning of the 20th century. This achievement is definitely due in part to Ernest Mile's contribution regarding lymphatic spread of tumor cells, which helped clarify the natural history of the disease and the proper treatment alternatives. He advocated a combined approach with the rationale to clear "the zone of upward spread." The aim of the present paper is to present a brief review concerning the evolution of rectal cancer surgery, focusing attention on Miles' abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APR) and its controversies and refinements over time. Although APR has currently been restricted to a small proportion of patients with low rectal cancer, recent propositions to excise the rectum performing a wider perineal and a proper pelvic floor resection have renewed interest on this procedure, confirming that Ernest Miles' original ideas still influence rectal cancer management after more than 100 years.