dc.creatorVersiani, Marco Aurelio
dc.creatorPecora, Jesus Djalma
dc.creatorSousa-Neto, Manoel Damião de
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T11:49:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:18:36Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T11:49:10Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:18:36Z
dc.date.created2013-10-14T11:49:10Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, NEW YORK, v. 38, n. 7, supl. 4, Part 1-2, pp. 977-982, JUL, 2012
dc.identifier0099-2399
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/34334
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.026
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.026
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1634203
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study examined the anatomy of 4-rooted maxillary second molars by using micro computed tomography. Methods: Twenty-five 4-rooted maxillary second molars were scanned to evaluate the size and curvature of the roots; the distance and spatial configuration between some anatomical landmarks; the number of root canals and the position of apical foramina; the occurrence of fusion of roots and enamel pearls; the configuration of the canal at the apical third; the cross-sectional appearance, the volume, and surface area of the root canals. Data were compared by using analysis of variance post hoc Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Results: The specimens were classified as types I (n = 16), II (n = 7), and III (n = 2). The size of the roots was similar (P > .05), and most of them presented straight with 1 canal, except the mesiobuccal that showed 2 canals in 24% of the samples. The configuration of the pulp chamber was mostly irregular quadrilateral-shaped. The lowest mean distance of the orifices was observed between the buccal roots (P < .05). Accessory canals were present mostly in the apical third. Location of the apical foramina varied considerably. Fusion of roots and enamel pearls occurred in 44% and 8% of the samples, respectively. Mean distance from the pulp chamber floor to the furcation was 2.15 +/- 0.57 mm. No statistical differences were found in the bi-dimensional and 3-dimensional analyses (P > .05). Conclusions: All analyzed parameters showed differences between roots, except for the length of the roots, the configuration of the canals at the apical third, cross-sectional appearance, volume, and surface area of the canals. (J Endod 2012;38:977-982)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.publisherNEW YORK
dc.relationJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectFOUR-ROOTED MAXILLARY SECOND MOLARS
dc.subjectMICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectROOT CANAL ANATOMY
dc.subjectROOT CANAL SYSTEM
dc.titleRoot and Root Canal Morphology of Four-rooted Maxillary Second Molars: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución