dc.creator | Bodanezi, Augusto | |
dc.creator | Munhoz, Etiene Andrade | |
dc.creator | Alvares Capelozza, Ana Lucia | |
dc.creator | Bernardineli, Norberti | |
dc.creator | de Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes | |
dc.creator | Garcia, Roberto Brandao | |
dc.creator | Bramante, Clovis Monteiro | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-31T10:57:53Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-04T16:12:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-31T10:57:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-04T16:12:54Z | |
dc.date.created | 2013-10-31T10:57:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier | JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, BAURU-SP, v. 20, n. 4, supl. 1, Part 2, pp. 404-409, JUL-AUG, 2012 | |
dc.identifier | 1678-7757 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/37087 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1590/S1678-77572012000400003 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000400003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1632951 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study compared the influence of three epoxy resin-based sealers with distinct radiopacities on the observers' ability to detect root canal filling voids during radiographic analysis. Material and methods: The root canals of 48 extracted maxillary canines were prepared and divided into three groups. Each group was laterally condensed with one sealer (AH Plus (TM), Acroseal (R) or a non-radiopaque sealer), and a longitudinal void was simulated in half of the specimens from each group (n = 8). Buccolingual radiographs were obtained and randomly interpreted for voids by a radiologist and an endodontist in a blinded fashion. Teeth were cut and inspected under a microscope to confirm the position of void. Differences in sensitivity and specificity between groups and examiners were compared using the Fisher's Exact and McNemar tests, respectively (alpha = 0.05). Results: Significantly lower sensitivity levels (p<0.05) were observed in the coronal portion of fillings performed with both radiopaque sealers. Specificity values for Acroseal (R) were significantly higher (p<0.05) in the coronal and apical portions of fillings. Conclusion: The type of root canal sealer can affect the observers' ability to detect root canal filling voids during radiographic analysis of upper single-rooted teeth. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | UNIV SAO PAULO FAC ODONTOLOGIA BAURU | |
dc.publisher | BAURU-SP | |
dc.relation | JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE | |
dc.rights | Copyright UNIV SAO PAULO FAC ODONTOLOGIA BAURU | |
dc.rights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | EPOXY RESINS | |
dc.subject | RADIOGRAPHY | |
dc.subject | ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS | |
dc.subject | ROOT CANAL OBTURATION | |
dc.subject | SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY | |
dc.title | Influence of root canal sealer on the radiographic appearance of filling voids in maxillary single-rooted teeth | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |