dc.creatorAntunes, Alberto A.
dc.creatorLeite, Katia R.
dc.creatorReis, Sabrina T.
dc.creatorSousa-Canavez, Juliana M.
dc.creatorCamara-Lopes, Luiz H.
dc.creatorDall'Oglio, Marcos F.
dc.creatorSrougi, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-01T15:37:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:11:40Z
dc.date.available2013-11-01T15:37:45Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:11:40Z
dc.date.created2013-11-01T15:37:45Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierUROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, NEW YORK, v. 30, n. 1, supl. 2, Part 3, pp. 16-20, JAN-FEB, 2012
dc.identifier1078-1439
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/37616
dc.identifier10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.09.014
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.09.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1632670
dc.description.abstractObjective: By reason of its heterogeneous behavior, it is difficult to determine the prognosis of many prostate cancer cases. Patients with the same clinicopathologic conditions may present varying clinical findings and rates of progression. We determined the role of new genes as potential molecular markers for prostate cancer prognosis. Materials and methods: We performed a microarray analysis of two pools of patients with prostate cancer divided according to their clinicopathologic characteristics. After that, we validated these results by testing the genes with most different expressions between the two pools using the quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction method. We analyzed gene expression in 33 patients with localized prostate cancer according to prostate specific antigen (PSA), pathologic stage, Gleason score, and biochemical recurrence. For statistical analysis we used the Mann-Whitney Test. Results: The microarray analysis revealed that 4,147 genes presented a different expression between the two pools. Among them, 3 genes, TMEFF2, GREB1, and THIL,, were at least 13-times overexpressed, and 1 gene, IGH3, which was at least 5times under-expressed in pool 1 (good prognosis) compared with pool 2 (bad prognosis), were selected for analysis. After the validation tests, GREB1 was significantly more overexpressed among patients with stage T2 compared with T3 (P = 0.020). The expressions of other 3 genes did not present significant differences according to the clinicopatholoOcal variables. Conclusions: Tissue expression of GREB1 is associated with organ-confined prostate cancer and may constitute a gene associated with a favorable prognosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.publisherNEW YORK
dc.relationUROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectPROSTATE
dc.subjectPROSTATE NEOPLASMS
dc.subjectBIOPSY
dc.subjectPROGNOSIS
dc.subjectGENE EXPRESSION
dc.subjectGREB1
dc.titleGREB1 tissue expression is associated with organ-confined prostate cancer
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución