dc.creatorTedde, Miguel Lia
dc.creatorOnders, Raymond P.
dc.creatorTeixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
dc.creatorLage, Silvia Gelas
dc.creatorBallester, Gerson
dc.creatorLersolino Brotto, Mario Wilson
dc.creatorOkumura, Erica Mie
dc.creatorJatene, Fabio Biscegli
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-29T15:35:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:03:23Z
dc.date.available2013-10-29T15:35:30Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:03:23Z
dc.date.created2013-10-29T15:35:30Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-02
dc.identifierJORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, BRASILIA DF, v. 38, n. 5, supl. 1, Part 2, pp. 566-572, SEP-OCT, 2012
dc.identifier1806-3713
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/36536
dc.identifier10.1590/S1806-37132012000500005 
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132012000500005 
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1631026
dc.description.abstractObjective: Patients with high cervical spinal cord injury are usually dependent on mechanical ventilation support, which, albeit life saving, is associated with complications and decreased life expectancy because of respiratory infections. Diaphragm pacing stimulation (DPS), sometimes referred to as electric ventilation, induces inhalation by stimulating the inspiratory muscles. Our objective was to highlight the indications for and some aspects of the surgical technique employed in the laparoscopic insertion of the DPS electrodes, as well as to describe five cases of tetraplegic patients submitted to the technique. Methods: Patient selection involved transcutaneous phrenic nerve studies in order to determine whether the phrenic nerves were preserved. The surgical approach was traditional laparoscopy, with four ports. The initial step was electrical mapping in order to locate the "motor points" (the points at which stimulation would cause maximal contraction of the diaphragm). If the diaphragm mapping was successful, four electrodes were implanted into the abdominal surface of the diaphragm, two on each side, to stimulate the branches of the phrenic nerve. Results: Of the five patients, three could breathe using DPS alone for more than 24 h, one could do so for more than 6 h, and one could not do so at all. Conclusions: Although a longer follow-up period is needed in order to reach definitive conclusions, the initial results have been promising. At this writing, most of our patients have been able to remain ventilator-free for long periods of time.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSOC BRASILEIRA PNEUMOLOGIA TISIOLOGIA
dc.publisherBRASILIA DF
dc.relationJORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA
dc.rightsCopyright SOC BRASILEIRA PNEUMOLOGIA TISIOLOGIA
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectSPINAL CORD INJURIES
dc.subjectQUADRIPLEGIA
dc.subjectRESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL
dc.subjectPACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL
dc.subjectDIAPHRAGM
dc.titleElectric Ventilation: indications for and technical aspects of diaphragm pacing stimulation surgical implantation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución