dc.creatorValero, R.
dc.creatorSchatloff, O.
dc.creatorChauhan, S.
dc.creatorHwiiKo, Y.
dc.creatorSivaraman, A.
dc.creatorCoelho, R. F.
dc.creatorPalmer, K. J.
dc.creatorDavila, H.
dc.creatorPatel, V. R.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-25T14:08:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:01:31Z
dc.date.available2013-10-25T14:08:17Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:01:31Z
dc.date.created2013-10-25T14:08:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, MADRID, v. 36, n. 2, supl. 1, Part 1, pp. 69-74, FEB, 2012
dc.identifier0210-4806
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/36056
dc.identifier10.1016/j.acuro.2011.06.010
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2011.06.010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1630609
dc.description.abstractBackground: The urethrovesical anastomosis is a particular challenging step of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Failure to achieve a watertight anastomosis is associated with postoperative urinary leak and its consequences, which include paralytic ileus, prolonged catheterization, urinary peritonitis and possibly re-intervention. The bidirectional barbed suture is a new technology that may lead to improve the quality of the urethrovesical anastomosis. Objective: To present our surgical technique of urethrovesical anastomosis, bladder neck reconstruction and posterior reconstruction, using a bidirectional barbed suture. Material and methods: The bladder neck reconstruction, posterior reconstruction and vesicourethral anastomosis were performed using a 2-0 synthetic absorbable bidirectional monofilament barbed suture Results: All cases were finished successfully without major complication or conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery. Conclusion: The authors successfully modified their RARP technique to take advantage of the properties of the bidirectional barbed suture. Comparative studies that evaluate objective outcomes such as leakage rates and operative time are needed to definitely establish the benefits of this device in comparison to the traditional absorbable monofilament. (C) 2011 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherENE EDICIONES SL
dc.publisherMADRID
dc.relationACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS
dc.rightsCopyright ENE EDICIONES SL
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectBARBED SUTURE
dc.subjectROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
dc.subjectKNOTLESS TISSUE-CLOSURE DEVICE
dc.subjectURETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS
dc.titleBidirectional Barbed Suture for Bladder Neck Reconstruction, Posterior Reconstruction and Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución