INVESTIGATING THE PRESENCE OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE IN UNIVERSITY GENERAL CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS

dc.creatorFernandes, Maria Angélica Moreira
dc.creatorPorto, Paulo Alves
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-24T11:33:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T16:00:42Z
dc.date.available2013-10-24T11:33:25Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T16:00:42Z
dc.date.created2013-10-24T11:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifierQUIMICA NOVA, SAO PAULO, v. 35, n. 2, pp. 420-429, APR-JUN, 2012
dc.identifier0100-4042
dc.identifierhttp://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/35839
dc.identifier10.1590/S0100-40422012000200034 
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422012000200034 
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1630432
dc.description.abstractINVESTIGATING THE PRESENCE OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE IN UNIVERSITY GENERAL CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS. This paper aims at analyzing the history of science content of three general chemistry textbooks used in Brazilian universities: the translations of Kotz and Treichel's Chemistry & Chemical Reactivity, Atkins and Jones's Chemical Principles, and Garritz and Chamizo's Quimica. Results revealed different trends for the inclusion of history of science in chemistry teaching. Katz & Treichel and Atkins & Jones used history mainly as curiosity and ornament. Garritz & Chamizo adopted the historical approach as one of the organizing axis of their textbook. Nevertheless, the historical content of the three textbooks may be criticized from current historiographical standpoint.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherSOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
dc.publisherSAO PAULO
dc.relationQUIMICA NOVA
dc.rightsCopyright SOC BRASILEIRA QUIMICA
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectGENERAL CHEMISTRY
dc.subjectTEXTBOOKS
dc.subjectHISTORY OF CHEMISTRY
dc.titleINVESTIGATING THE PRESENCE OF THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE IN UNIVERSITY GENERAL CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución