dc.creatorFIDALE, Ludmila C.
dc.creatorRUIZ, Naiara
dc.creatorHEINZE, Thomas
dc.creatorSEOUD, Omar A. El
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T05:24:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:50:03Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T05:24:29Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:50:03Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T05:24:29Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierMACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, v.209, n.12, p.1240-1254, 2008
dc.identifier1022-1352
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/31396
dc.identifier10.1002/macp.200800021
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/macp.200800021
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1628034
dc.description.abstractThe swelling of microcrystalline, native and mercerized cotton and eucalyptus celluloses by 16 aprotic solvents was investigated. The number of moles of solvent/anhydroglucose unit, nSw, correlates well with solvent molar volume, basicity and dipolarity/polarizability. Swelling is sensitive to cellulose crystallite size, surface area and the presence of its chains in parallel or anti-parallel arrangements. Use of solvatochromic parameters is a superior alternative to the use of other descriptors, such as Hildebrand`s solubility parameters and Gutmann`s donor numbers. The calculated nSw for 28 protic and aprotic solvents correlated well with their experimental counterparts, although hydrogen bond donation by the solvent was not included.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
dc.relationMacromolecular Chemistry and Physics
dc.rightsCopyright WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectcellulose
dc.subjectfibers
dc.subjectstructure-property relations
dc.subjectswelling
dc.titleCellulose swelling by aprotic and protic solvents: What are the similarities and differences?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución