dc.creatorOLYMPIO, Kelly Polido Kaneshiro
dc.creatorNAOZUKA, Juliana
dc.creatorMAGALHAES, Ana Carolina
dc.creatorGARCIA, Manuel Valentim de Pera
dc.creatorOLIVEIRA, Pedro Vitoriano de
dc.creatorBUZALAF, Marilia Afonso Rabelo
dc.creatorBECHARA, Etelvino Jose Henriques
dc.creatorGUENTHER, Wanda Maria Risso
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T05:22:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:48:52Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T05:22:50Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:48:52Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T05:22:50Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, v.73, n.9, p.627-636, 2010
dc.identifier1528-7394
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/31109
dc.identifier10.1080/15287390903578224
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15287390903578224
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1627747
dc.description.abstractLead (Pb) poisoning is preventable but continues to be a public health problem in several countries. Measuring Pb in the surface dental enamel (SDE) using microbiopsies is a rapid, safe, and painless procedure. There are different protocols to perform these microbiopsies, but the reliability of dental enamel lead levels (DELL) determination is dependent upon biopsy depth (BD). It is established that DELL decrease from the outermost superficial layer to the inner layer of dental enamel. The aim of this study was to determine DELL obtained by two different microbiopsy techniques on SDE termed protocol I and protocol II. Two consecutive enamel layers were removed from the same subject group (n = 138) for both protocols. Protocol I consisted of a biopsied site with a diameter of 4 mm after the application of 10 l HCl for 35 s. Protocol II involved a biopsied site of 1.6 mm diameter after application of 5 l HCl for 20 s. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences for BD and DELL between homologous teeth using protocol I. However, there was a significant difference between DELL in the first and second layers using both protocols. Further, the BD in protocol II overestimated DELL values. In conclusion, SDE analyzed by microbiopsy is a reliable biomarker in protocol I, but the chemical method to calculate BD in protocol II appeared to be inadequate for measurement of DELL. Thus, DELL could not be compared among studies that used different methodologies for SDE microbiopsies.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.relationJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-part A-current Issues
dc.rightsCopyright TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleMicrobiopsies of Surface Dental Enamel as a Tool to Measure Body Lead Burden
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución