dc.creatorMARQUES, Amelia Pasqual
dc.creatorASSUMPCAO, Ana
dc.creatorMATSUTANI, Luciana A.
dc.creatorPEREIRA, Carlos A. Braganca
dc.creatorLAGE, Lais
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T04:44:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:46:25Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T04:44:51Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:46:25Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T04:44:51Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, v.33, n.3, p.345-351, 2008
dc.identifier0303-464X
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/30530
dc.identifierhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000260021900009&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1627169
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to verify the discriminative power of the most widely used pain assessment instruments. Methods: The sample consisted of 279 subjects divided into Fibromyalgia Group (FM- 205 patients with fibromyalgia) and Control Group (CG-74 healthy subjects), mean age 49.29 +/- 10.76 years. Only 9 subjects were male, 6 in FM and 3 in CG. FM were outpatients from the Rheumatology Clinic of the University of Sao Paulo - Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP); the CG included people accompanying patients and hospital staff with similar socio-demographic characteristics. Three instruments were used to assess pain: the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Dolorimetry, to measure pain threshold on tender points (generating the TP index). In order to assess the discriminative power of the instruments, the measurements obtained were submitted to descriptive analysis and inferential analysis using ROC Curve - sensibility (S), specificity (S I) and area under the curve (AUC) - and Contingence tables with Chi-square Test and odds ratio. Significance level was 0.05. Results: Higher sensibility, specificity and area under the curve was obtained by VAS (80%, 80% and 0.864, respectively), followed by Dolorimetry (S 77%, S177% and AUC 0.851), McGill Sensory (S 72%, S167% and AUC 0.765) and McGill Affective (S 69%, S1 67% and AUC 0.753). Conclusions: VAS presented the higher sensibility, specificity and AUC, showing the greatest discriminative power among the instruments. However, these values are considerably similar to those of Dolorimetry.
dc.languagepor
dc.publisherMEDFARMA-EDICOES MEDICAS, LDA
dc.relationActa Reumatologica Portuguesa
dc.rightsCopyright MEDFARMA-EDICOES MEDICAS, LDA
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectFibromyalgia
dc.subjectMcGill Pain Questionnaire
dc.subjectPain Threshold
dc.subjectVisual Analog Scale
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.titlePAIN IN FIBROMYALGIA AND DISCRIMINATIVE POWER OF THE INSTRUMENTS: VISUAL ANALOG SCALE, DOLORIMETRY AND THE MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución