dc.creatorGrohmann, Carlos Henrique
dc.creatorSMITH, Mike J.
dc.creatorRiccomini, Claudio
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T04:37:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:45:31Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T04:37:17Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:45:31Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T04:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifierIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, v.49, n.4, p.1200-1213, 2011
dc.identifier0196-2892
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/30321
dc.identifier10.1109/TGRS.2010.2053546
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2053546
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1626961
dc.description.abstractSurface roughness is an important geomorphological variable which has been used in the Earth and planetary sciences to infer material properties, current/past processes, and the time elapsed since formation. No single definition exists; however, within the context of geomorphometry, we use surface roughness as an expression of the variability of a topographic surface at a given scale, where the scale of analysis is determined by the size of the landforms or geomorphic features of interest. Six techniques for the calculation of surface roughness were selected for an assessment of the parameter`s behavior at different spatial scales and data-set resolutions. Area ratio operated independently of scale, providing consistent results across spatial resolutions. Vector dispersion produced results with increasing roughness and homogenization of terrain at coarser resolutions and larger window sizes. Standard deviation of residual topography highlighted local features and did not detect regional relief. Standard deviation of elevation correctly identified breaks of slope and was good at detecting regional relief. Standard deviation of slope (SD(slope)) also correctly identified smooth sloping areas and breaks of slope, providing the best results for geomorphological analysis. Standard deviation of profile curvature identified the breaks of slope, although not as strongly as SD(slope), and it is sensitive to noise and spurious data. In general, SD(slope) offered good performance at a variety of scales, while the simplicity of calculation is perhaps its single greatest benefit.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
dc.relationIeee Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
dc.rightsCopyright IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectDigital elevation model (DEM)
dc.subjectdigital terrain analysis
dc.subjectgeomorphology
dc.subjectgeomorphometry
dc.subjectsurface roughness
dc.titleMultiscale Analysis of Topographic Surface Roughness in the Midland Valley, Scotland
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución