dc.creatorANDRIANI JR., Wilson
dc.creatorSUZUKI, Marcelo
dc.creatorBONFANTE, Estevam A.
dc.creatorCARVALHO, Ricardo M.
dc.creatorSILVA, Nelson R.
dc.creatorCOELHO, Paulo G.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T00:58:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:25:26Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T00:58:00Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:25:26Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T00:58:00Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, v.12, n.4, p.311-317, 2010
dc.identifier1461-5185
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26109
dc.identifier10.3290/j.jad.a17710
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a17710
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1622773
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To test the strength to failure and fracture mode of three indirect composite materials directly applied onto Ti-6Al-4V implant abutments vs cemented standard porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) crowns. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four locking taper abutments were randomly allocated to four groups and were cleaned in ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. After drying under ambient conditions, the abutments were grit blasted and a custom 4-cusp molar crown mold was utilized to produce identical crowns (n = 16 per group) of Tescera (Bisco), Ceramage (Shofu), and Diamond Crown (DRM) according to the manufacturer`s instructions. The porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns were fabricated by conventional means involving the construction and a wax pattern and casting of a metallic coping followed by sintering of increasing layers of porcelain. All crowns were loaded to failure by an indenter placed at one of the cusp tips at a 1 mm/min rate. Subsequently, fracture analysis was performed by means of stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. One-way ANOVA at 95% level of significance was utilized for statistical analysis. Results: The single load to failure (+/- SD) results were: Tescera (1130 +/- 239 N), Ceramage (1099 +/- 257 N), Diamond Crown (1155 +/- 284 N), and PFM (1081 +/- 243 N). Stereomicroscopy analysis showed two distinct failure modes, where the loaded cusp failed either with or without abutment/metallic coping exposure. SEM analysis of the fractures showed multiple crack propagation towards the cervical region of the crown below a region of plastic deformation at the indenter contact region. Conclusion: The three indirect composites and PFM systems fractured at loads higher than those typically associated with normal occlusal function. Although each material had a different composition and handling technique, no significant differences were found concerning their single load to fracture resistance among composite systems and PFM.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.relationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.rightsCopyright QUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectimplant
dc.subjectrestoration
dc.subjectintegrated abutment crown
dc.subjectindirect composite
dc.subjectsingle unit
dc.titleMechanical Testing of Indirect Composite Materials Directly Applied on Implant Abutments
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución