dc.creatorLIMA, Marta Cunha
dc.creatorFRANCO, Eduardo Jacomino
dc.creatorJANSON, Guilherme
dc.creatorCARVALHO, Izabel Maria Marchi
dc.creatorSANTOS, Carlos Ferreira
dc.creatorCAPELOZZA, Ana Lucia Alvares
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T00:54:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:24:48Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T00:54:50Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:24:48Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T00:54:50Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierCLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, v.46, n.5, p.481-486, 2009
dc.identifier1055-6656
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/25975
dc.identifier10.1597/08-018.1
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1597/08-018.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1622640
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate the prevalence of upper cervical vertebrae anomalies in patients with isolated cleft lip, isolated cleft palate, and complete cleft lip and palate, as well as to compare the prevalence of these anomalies between groups, between genders, and with noncleft patients. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study of randomly selected patients. Setting: Radiology Section, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies and Department of Orthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Participants: The sample comprised 300 lateral cephalograms of cleft patients, aged 12 to 13 years, of both genders, from the files of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies-University of Sao Paulo and 300 lateral cephalograms from noncleft patients of the Department of Orthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry. Cephalograms of patients with syndromes were not included. Method: Radiographs were interpreted on a film viewer by a single examiner; the profiles of vertebrae were traced on acetate paper, and cervical vertebrae anomalies were registered and categorized into posterior arch deficiencies, fusion, and association of both. Main Outcome Measures: Statistical comparison of groups using the chi-square test. Results: In the cleft group, 38.67% of the patients had cervical vertebrae anomalies. Of those in the noncleft sample, 31% showed anomalies of the cervical spine. This difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference when the types of clefts were compared with each other or when both genders were compared in both samples. Conclusions: This study confirms the association between clefts and cervical anomalies. Additional research on this topic is necessary.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
dc.relationCleft Palate-craniofacial Journal
dc.rightsCopyright ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP DIVISION ALLEN PRESS
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectcephalogram
dc.subjectcervical vertebrae anomalies
dc.subjectclefts
dc.titlePrevalence of Upper Cervical Vertebrae Anomalies in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate and Noncleft Patients
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución