dc.creatorMAGALHAES, A. C.
dc.creatorKATO, M. T.
dc.creatorRIOS, D.
dc.creatorWIEGAND, A.
dc.creatorATTIN, T.
dc.creatorBUZALAF, M. A. R.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T00:54:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:24:26Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T00:54:00Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:24:26Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T00:54:00Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierCARIES RESEARCH, v.42, n.4, p.269-274, 2008
dc.identifier0008-6568
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/25901
dc.identifier10.1159/000135672
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000135672
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1622566
dc.description.abstractThis in vitro study assessed the effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to commercial NaF and NaF/CaF(2) varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on enamel erosion. For this, 72 bovine enamel specimens were randomly allocated to the following treatments: NaF varnish (2.26% F), NaF/CaF(2) varnish (5.63% F), 4% TiF(4) varnish (2.45% F), F-free placebo varnish, 4% TiF(4) solution (2.45% F) and control (not treated). The varnishes were applied in a thin layer and removed after 6 h. The solution was applied to the enamel surface for 1 min. Then, the specimens were alternately de- and remineralized (6 times/day) in an artificial mouth for 5 days at 37 degrees C. Demineralization was performed with the beverage Sprite (1 min, 3 ml/min) and remineralization with artificial saliva (day: 59 min, 0.5 ml/min; during the night: 0.1 ml/min). The mean daily increment of erosion and the cumulative erosion data were tested using ANOVA and ANCOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey`s test (alpha = 0.05). The mean daily erosion increments and cumulative erosion (micrometers) were significantly less for the TiF(4) varnish (0.30 +/- 0.11/0.65 +/- 0.75) than for the NaF varnish (0.58 +/- 0.11/1.47 +/- 1.07) or the NaF/CaF(2) varnish (0.62 +/- 0.10/1.68 +/- 1.17), which in turn showed significantly less erosion than the placebo varnish (0.78 +/- 0.12/2.05 +/- 1.43), TiF(4) solution (0.86 +/- 0.11/2.05 +/- 1.49) and control (0.77 +/- 0.16/2.06 +/- 1.49). In conclusion, the TiF(4) varnish seems to be a promising treatment to reduce enamel loss under mild erosive conditions. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherKARGER
dc.relationCaries Research
dc.rightsCopyright KARGER
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectdental erosion
dc.subjectenamel
dc.subjectfluoride
dc.subjecttitanium
dc.titleThe effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to NaF varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on dental erosion in vitro
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución