dc.creatorESTEVES-OLIVEIRA, M.
dc.creatorPASAPORTI, C.
dc.creatorHEUSSEN, N.
dc.creatorEDUARDO, C. P.
dc.creatorLAMPERT, F.
dc.creatorAPEL, C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-20T00:15:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:22:50Z
dc.date.available2012-10-20T00:15:42Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:22:50Z
dc.date.created2012-10-20T00:15:42Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, v.39, n.9, p.604-611, 2011
dc.identifier0300-5712
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/25580
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.007
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1622246
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of CO(2) laser irradiation (10.6 mu m) at 0.3 J/cm(2) (0.5 mu s; 226 Hz) on the resistance of softened enamel to toothbrushing abrasion, in vitro. Methods: Sixty human enamel samples were obtained, polished with silicon carbide papers and randomly divided into five groups (n = 12), receiving 5 different surface treatments: laser irradiation (L), fluoride (AmF/NaF gel) application (F), laser prior to fluoride (LF), fluoride prior to laser (FL), non-treated control (C). After surface treatment they were submitted to a 25-day erosive-abrasive cycle in 100 ml sprite light (90 s) and brushed twice daily with an electric toothbrush. Between the demineralization periods samples were immersed in supersaturated mineral solution. At the end of the experiments enamel surface loss was determined using a contact profilometer and morphological analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For SEM analysis of demineralization pattern, cross-sectional cuts of cycled samples were prepared. The data were statistically analysed by one-way ANOVA model with subsequent pairwise comparison of treatments. Results: Abrasive surface loss was significantly lower in all laser groups compared to both control and fluoride groups (p < 0.0001 in all cases). Amongst the laser groups no significant difference was observed. Softened enamel layer underneath lesions was less pronounced in laser-irradiated samples. Conclusion: Irradiation of dental enamel with a CO(2) laser at 0.3 J/cm(2) (5 mu s, 226 Hz) either alone or in combination with amine fluoride gel significantly decreases toothbrushing abrasion of softened-enamel, in vitro. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.relationJournal of Dentistry
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectCO2 laser
dc.subjectToothbrush
dc.subjectProfilometer
dc.subjectErosion
dc.subjectAbrasion
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectEnamel
dc.subjectFluoride
dc.subjectAcid
dc.titlePrevention of toothbrushing abrasion of acid-softened enamel by CO(2) laser irradiation
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución