dc.creatorALEXANDRE JR., Veriano
dc.creatorMONTEIRO, Edna Almeida
dc.creatorFREITAS-LIMA, Priscila
dc.creatorPINTO, Kylvia Dantas
dc.creatorVELASCO, Tonicarlo Rodrigues
dc.creatorTERRA, Vera Cristina
dc.creatorPINHEIRO-MARTINS, Ana Paula
dc.creatorSOUZA, Roberto Molina
dc.creatorPERUCCA, Emilio
dc.creatorSAKAMOTO, Americo Ceiki
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T23:40:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:20:19Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T23:40:46Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:20:19Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T23:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifierEPILEPTIC DISORDERS, v.13, n.1, Special Issue 1, p.56-60, 2011
dc.identifier1294-9361
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/25052
dc.identifier10.1684/epd.2011.0411
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1684/epd.2011.0411
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1621778
dc.description.abstractBackground. Patients with refractory epilepsy often have impaired quality of life (QOL) as a consequence of seizures and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. We assessed the impact of adverse effects on QOL and the utility of a structured instrument to help the physician manage adverse effects in patients with refractory epilepsy. Methods. Clinical characteristics, drug treatment and adverse effects were evaluated in 102 patients with refractory epilepsy at a single tertiary referral centre. The Adverse Events Profile (AEP) and Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) questionnaires were completed at baseline and after six months. At baseline, patients with a high burden of adverse effects (AEP scores >= 45) were randomized to an intervention or control group. AEP scores in the intervention group were available to the physician as an instrument to help to reduce adverse effects. Results. Ninety-five patients (93.1%) were on polytherapy. Sixty-six completed the questionnaires and, of these, 43 (65.1%) had a high AE burden and were randomized to the intervention and control group. QOLIE-31 scores were inversely correlated with AEP scores at both visits. Among randomized patients, AEP scores tended to decrease between the baseline and the final visit without significant differences between groups (intervention group: 54.1 +/- 6.1 vs 51.1 +/- 9.1; control group: 55.8 +/- 5.8 vs 50.5 +/- 12.2). QOLIE-31 scores did not change substantially between visits (intervention group: 45.9 +/- 17.4 vs 48.4 +/- 14; control group: 47.5 +/- 15.7 vs 45.2 +/- 18.9). Conclusion. A significant proportion of patients had a high toxicity burden which had an impact on their QOL. Reduction of over-treatment is a difficult challenge which cannot be addressed solely by providing a structured assessment of adverse effects, but requires a more comprehensive approach aimed at optimizing the many components of the management strategy.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
dc.relationEpileptic Disorders
dc.rightsCopyright JOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectepilepsy
dc.subjectdrug resistance
dc.subjectantiepileptic drugs
dc.subjectovertreatment
dc.subjectadverse effects
dc.titleAddressing overtreatment in patients with refractory epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre in Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución