dc.creatorFELICIO, Claudia Maria de
dc.creatorFERREIRA, Claudia Lucia Pimenta
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T23:32:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:18:57Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T23:32:12Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:18:57Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T23:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, v.72, n.3, p.367-375, 2008
dc.identifier0165-5876
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/24743
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.11.012
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.11.012
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1621469
dc.description.abstractObjective: In the literature there is no validated instrument for the clinical evaluation of the orofacial myofunctional condition of children that will permit the examiner to express numerically his perception of the characteristics and behaviors observed. The proposal of this study is to describe a protocol for the evaluation of children aged 6-12 years in order to establish relations between the orofacial. myofunctional conditions and numerical scales. The protocol validity, reliability of the examiners and agreement between them was analyzed. Methods: Eighty children aged 6-12 years participated in the study. All were evaluated and 30 were selected at random for the analyses (age range: 72-149 months, mean = 103.3, S.D. = 23.57). Individuals with and without orofacial myofunctional. disorders were included. The examiners were two speech therapists property calibrated in orofacial myofunctional evaluation. Two protocols were constructed. One, based on traditional models, was called traditional orofacial. myofunctional. evaluation (TOME), and the other, with the addition of numerical scales, was called orofacial myofunctional. evaluation with scores (OMES). The clinical conditions included were: appearance, posture and mobility of lips, tongue, cheeks and jaws, respiration, mastication and deglutition. Statistical analysis was performed using the split-half reliability method. Means, standard deviations and the Spearman correlation coefficient were also calculated. Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between the evaluations of 30 children assessed with the TOME and OMES protocols (r = 0.85, p < 0.01). The reliability between protocols was 0.92. The test-retest reliability of the OMES instrument was 0.99 and the correlation was 0.98. Reliability between examiners 1 and 2 using the OMES protocol was 0.99, and the correlation was 0.98 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The OMES protocot proved to be a valid and reliable instrument for orofacial myofunctional evaluation, permitting the grading of orofacial myofunctional conditions within the limits of the selected items. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.relationInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectorofacial myofunctional evaluation
dc.subjectstomatognathic system
dc.subjectmobility
dc.subjectrespiration
dc.subjectmastication and deglutition
dc.subjectscales evaluation
dc.subjectorofacial myofunctional disorders
dc.titleProtocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución