dc.creatorFELICIO, C. M. De
dc.creatorSIDEQUERSKY, F. V.
dc.creatorTARTAGLIA, G. M.
dc.creatorSFORZA, C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T23:32:03Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:18:51Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T23:32:03Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:18:51Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T23:32:03Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, v.36, n.8, p.577-583, 2009
dc.identifier0305-182X
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/24716
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01970.x
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01970.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1621442
dc.description.abstractP>The determination of normal parameters is an important procedure in the evaluation of the stomatognathic system. We used the surface electromyography standardization protocol described by Ferrario et al. (J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:33-40, 2006;33:341) to determine reference values of the electromyographic standardized indices for the assessment of muscular symmetry (left and right side, percentage overlapping coefficient, POC), potential lateral displacing components (unbalanced contractile activities of contralateral masseter and temporalis muscles, TC), relative activity (most prevalent pair of masticatory muscles, ATTIV) and total activity (integrated areas of the electromyographic potentials over time, IMPACT) in healthy Brazilian young adults, and the relevant data reproducibility. Electromyography of the right and left masseter and temporalis muscles was performed during maximum teeth clenching in 20 healthy subjects (10 women and 10 men, mean age 23 years, s.d. 3), free from periodontal problems, temporomandibular disorders, oro-facial myofunctional disorder, and with full permanent dentition (28 teeth at least). Data reproducibility was computed for 75% of the sample. The values obtained were POC Temporal (88 center dot 11 +/- 1 center dot 45%), POC masseter (87 center dot 11 +/- 1 center dot 60%), TC (8 center dot 79 +/- 1 center dot 20%), ATTIV (-0 center dot 33 +/- 9 center dot 65%) and IMPACT (110 center dot 40 +/- 23 center dot 69 mu V/mu V center dot s %). There were no statistical differences between test and retest values (P > 0 center dot 05). The Technical Errors of Measurement (TEM) for 50% of subjects assessed during the same session were 1 center dot 5, 1 center dot 39, 1 center dot 06, 3 center dot 83 and 10 center dot 04. For 25% of the subjects assessed after a 6-month interval, the TEM were 0 center dot 80, 1 center dot 03, 0 center dot 73, 12 center dot 70 and 19 center dot 10. For all indices, there was good reproducibility. These electromyographic indices could be used in the assessment of patients with stomatognathic dysfunction.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
dc.relationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.rightsCopyright WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectelectromyography
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjecttemporal muscle
dc.subjectmasseter muscle
dc.subjectsymmetry
dc.titleElectromyographic standardized indices in healthy Brazilian young adults and data reproducibility
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución