dc.creatorCORTES, Jorge
dc.creatorSOUZA, Carmino De
dc.creatorAYALA-SANCHEZ, Manuel
dc.creatorBENDIT, Israel
dc.creatorBEST-AGUILERA, Carlos
dc.creatorENRICO, Alicia
dc.creatorHAMERSCHLAK, Nelson
dc.creatorPAGNANO, Katia
dc.creatorPASQUINI, Ricardo
dc.creatorMEILLON, Luis
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T18:23:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:10:57Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T18:23:21Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:10:57Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T18:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierCANCER, v.116, n.21, p.4991-5000, 2010
dc.identifier0008-543X
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/22941
dc.identifier10.1002/cncr.25273
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25273
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1619672
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Treatment recommendations have been developed for management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: A 30-item multiple-choice questionnaire was administered to 435 hematologists and oncohematologists in 16 Latin American countries. Physicians self-reported their diagnostic, therapeutic, and disease management strategies. RESULTS: Imatinib is available as initial therapy to 92% of physicians, and 42% of physicians have access to both second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Standard-dose imatinib is the preferred initial therapy for most patients, but 20% would manage a young patient initially with an allogeneic stem cell transplant from a sibling donor, and 10% would only offer hydroxyurea to an elderly patient. Seventy-two percent of responders perform routine cytogenetic analysis for monitoring patients on therapy, and 59% routinely use quantitative polymerase chain reaction. For patients who fail imatinib therapy, 61% would increase the dose of imatinib before considering change to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, except for patients aged 60 years, for whom a switch to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was the preferred choice. CONCLUSIONS: The answers to this survey provide insight into the management of patients with CML in Latin America. Some deviations from current recommendations were identified. Understanding the treatment patterns of patients with CML in broad population studies is important to identify needs and improve patient care. Cancer 2010;116:4991-5000. (C) 2070 American Cancer Society.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJOHN WILEY & SONS INC
dc.relationCancer
dc.rightsCopyright JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectchronic myeloid leukemia
dc.subjectimatinib
dc.subjectdasatinib
dc.subjectnilotinib
dc.subjecttyrosine kinase inhibitors
dc.subjectguidelines
dc.subjectLatin America
dc.subjectsurvey
dc.titleCurrent Patient Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Latin America A Study by the Latin American Leukemia Net (LALNET)
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución