dc.creator | VICENTE, Jose Ricardo Negreiros | |
dc.creator | CROCI, Alberto Tesconi | |
dc.creator | CAMARGO, Olavo Pires de | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-19T17:32:01Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-04T15:08:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-19T17:32:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-04T15:08:36Z | |
dc.date.created | 2012-10-19T17:32:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier | Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, v.17, n.2, p.14-17, 2009 | |
dc.identifier | 1413-7852 | |
dc.identifier | http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/22389 | |
dc.identifier | http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000267329700002&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1619161 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the challenges in obtaining a successful restoration of the rotation center as well as a good positioning of the acetabular component when using the minimally-invasive posterior approach for uncemented total hip replacement. Methods: In a comparative non-random prospective study, 64 adult patients underwent elective total hip arthroplasty using the minimally-invasive posterior approach performed by one single surgeon, All patients included in this study had a superior and lateral migration of the rotation center of the hip in comparison to the normal contralateral hip. Patients were excluded from the study if they presented the following: diagnosis of femoral neck fracture, displasic hip types 2, 3 and 4 (Crowe`s classification), osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip. Of the 64 patients in the study, 39 had a radiographic pre-op acetabular size planning equal or less than 50 mm and 25 patients had a radiographic pre-op acetabular size planning equal or more than 52 mm. We considered a good result the following goals: acetabular bend between 35 and 50 degrees, acetabular size according to the pre-op estimative with full contact in the three zones of DeLee-Charnley, a lower medial and vertical positioning of the rotation center in comparison with the pre-op values and a final limb discrepancy lower than 10 mm. Results: A better restoration of the rotation center, as well as, excellent acetabular positioning was found in patients with smaller acetabular size (equal or less than 50), p=0, 04. We must draw attention to two risks when using the minimally-invasive posterior approach: a vertical acetabular position and a lateral position of the acetabular component increasing the risk of a poor contact in the zone 1 due to an insufficient reaming of the medial acetabular host bone. Conclusion: We propose standard surgical approaches in patients with larger anatomical measurements (acetabular planning size more than 50). | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA | |
dc.relation | Acta Ortopédica Brasileira | |
dc.rights | Copyright ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA | |
dc.rights | closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Arthroplasty | |
dc.subject | replacement | |
dc.subject | hip | |
dc.subject | Minimally-invasive surgical procedures | |
dc.subject | Human | |
dc.title | RESTORATION OF THE ROTATION CENTER IN MINIMALLY-INVASIVE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |