dc.creatorVICENTE, Jose Ricardo Negreiros
dc.creatorCROCI, Alberto Tesconi
dc.creatorCAMARGO, Olavo Pires de
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T17:32:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:08:36Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T17:32:01Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:08:36Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T17:32:01Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierActa Ortopédica Brasileira, v.17, n.2, p.14-17, 2009
dc.identifier1413-7852
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/22389
dc.identifierhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000267329700002&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1619161
dc.description.abstractObjective: Our aim was to evaluate the challenges in obtaining a successful restoration of the rotation center as well as a good positioning of the acetabular component when using the minimally-invasive posterior approach for uncemented total hip replacement. Methods: In a comparative non-random prospective study, 64 adult patients underwent elective total hip arthroplasty using the minimally-invasive posterior approach performed by one single surgeon, All patients included in this study had a superior and lateral migration of the rotation center of the hip in comparison to the normal contralateral hip. Patients were excluded from the study if they presented the following: diagnosis of femoral neck fracture, displasic hip types 2, 3 and 4 (Crowe`s classification), osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip. Of the 64 patients in the study, 39 had a radiographic pre-op acetabular size planning equal or less than 50 mm and 25 patients had a radiographic pre-op acetabular size planning equal or more than 52 mm. We considered a good result the following goals: acetabular bend between 35 and 50 degrees, acetabular size according to the pre-op estimative with full contact in the three zones of DeLee-Charnley, a lower medial and vertical positioning of the rotation center in comparison with the pre-op values and a final limb discrepancy lower than 10 mm. Results: A better restoration of the rotation center, as well as, excellent acetabular positioning was found in patients with smaller acetabular size (equal or less than 50), p=0, 04. We must draw attention to two risks when using the minimally-invasive posterior approach: a vertical acetabular position and a lateral position of the acetabular component increasing the risk of a poor contact in the zone 1 due to an insufficient reaming of the medial acetabular host bone. Conclusion: We propose standard surgical approaches in patients with larger anatomical measurements (acetabular planning size more than 50).
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
dc.relationActa Ortopédica Brasileira
dc.rightsCopyright ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
dc.rightsclosedAccess
dc.subjectArthroplasty
dc.subjectreplacement
dc.subjecthip
dc.subjectMinimally-invasive surgical procedures
dc.subjectHuman
dc.titleRESTORATION OF THE ROTATION CENTER IN MINIMALLY-INVASIVE TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución