dc.creatorGARCIA, Euler de Vilhena
dc.creatorSAMESIMA, Nelson
dc.creatorPEREIRA FILHO, Horacio G.
dc.creatorQUADROS, Cristina M.
dc.creatorSILVA, Luis Tenorio Cavalcante da
dc.creatorMARTINELLI FILHO, Martino
dc.creatorHANNOUCHE, Maria Luciana Zacharias
dc.creatorMATHIAS, Wilson
dc.creatorPASTORE, Carlos Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T17:00:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:03:42Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T17:00:21Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:03:42Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T17:00:21Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, v.14, n.2, p.108-118, 2009
dc.identifier1082-720X
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/21266
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00285.x
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00285.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1618041
dc.description.abstractBackground: Current relevance of T-wave alternans is based on its association with electrical disorder and elevated cardiac risk. Quantitative reports would improve understanding on TWA augmentation mechanisms during mental stress or prior to tachyarrhythmias. However, little information is available about quantitative TWA values in clinical populations. This study aims to create and compare TWA profiles of healthy subjects and ICD patients, evaluated on treadmill stress protocols. Methods: Apparently healthy subjects, not in use of any medication were recruited. All eligible ICD patients were capable of performing an attenuated stress test. TWA analysis was performed during a 15-lead treadmill test. The derived comparative profile consisted of TWA amplitude and its associated heart rate, at rest (baseline) and at peak TWA value. Chi-square or Mann-Whitney tests were used with p values <= 0.05. Discriminatory performance was evaluated by a binary logistic regression model. Results: 31 healthy subjects (8F, 23M) and 32 ICD patients (10F, 22M) were different on baseline TWA (1 +/- 2 mu V; 8 +/- 9 mu V; p < 0.001) and peak TWA values (26 +/- 13 mu V; 37 +/- 20 mu V; p = 0,009) as well as on baseline TWA heart rate (79 +/- 10 bpm; 67 +/- 15 bpm; p < 0.001) and peak TWA heart rate (118 +/- 8 bpm; 90 +/- 17 bpm; p < 0.001). The logistic model yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 88.9% and 92.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Healthy subjects and ICD patients have distinct TWA profiles. The new TWA profile representation (in amplitude-heart rate pairs) may help comparison among different research protocols. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2009;14(2):108-118.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
dc.relationAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
dc.rightsCopyright WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectelectrocardiography
dc.subjectT-wave alternans
dc.subjecthealthy subjects
dc.subjectICD
dc.titleComparison of Quantitative T-Wave Alternans Profiles of Healthy Subjects and ICD Patients
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución