dc.creatorBARNES, Allan J.
dc.creatorMARTINIS, Bruno S. De
dc.creatorGORELICK, David A.
dc.creatorGOODWIN, Robert S.
dc.creatorKOLBRICH, Erin A.
dc.creatorHUESTIS, Marilyn A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T14:14:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T15:00:31Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T14:14:11Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T15:00:31Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T14:14:11Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierCLINICAL CHEMISTRY, v.55, n.3, p.454-462, 2009
dc.identifier0009-9147
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/20710
dc.identifier10.1373/clinchem.2008.117093
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.117093
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1617489
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Understanding the excretion of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and metabolites in sweat is vital for interpretation of sweat tests in drug treatment, criminal justice, and workplace programs. METHODS: Placebo, low (1.0 mg/kg), and high (1.6 mg/kg) doses of oral MDMA were given double-blind in random order to healthy volunteers (n = 15) with histories of MDMA use. Participants resided on the closed clinical research unit for up to 7 days after each dose. Volunteers wore PharmChek (R) sweat patches (n = 640) before, during, and after controlled dosing. Patches were analyzed by solid phase extraction and GC-MS for MDMA, methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyamphetamine (HMA), and 4hydroxy-3-methoxymethamphetamine (HMMA). Limits of quantification (LOQ) were 2.5 ng/patch for MDMA and 5 ng/patch for HMA, HMMA, and MDA. RESULTS: MDMA was the primary analyte detected in 382 patches (59.7%), with concentrations up to 3007 ng/patch. MDA was detected in 188 patches (29.4%) at <172 ng/patch, whereas no HMMA or HMA was detected; 224 patches (35.0%) and 60 patches (9.4%) were positive for MDMA and MDA, respectively, at the 25-ng/patch threshold proposed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. CONCLUSIONS: Sweat testing was shown to be an effective and reliable method for monitoring MDMA use in this controlled MDMA administration study. However, variability in sweat excretion suggests that results should be interpreted qualitatively rather than quantitatively. These data provide a scientific database for interpretation of MDMA sweat test results. (C) 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
dc.relationClinical Chemistry
dc.rightsCopyright AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.titleDisposition of MDMA and Metabolites in Human Sweat Following Controlled MDMA Administration
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución