dc.creatorROSARIO, M. F.
dc.creatorSILVA, M. A. N.
dc.creatorCOELHO, A. A. D.
dc.creatorSAVINO, V. J. M.
dc.creatorDIAS, C. T. S.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T02:26:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:53:54Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T02:26:52Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:53:54Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T02:26:52Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifierANIMAL, v.2, n.3, p.419-424, 2008
dc.identifier1751-7311
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/19187
dc.identifier10.1017/S1751731107001012
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001012
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1615977
dc.description.abstractThe mechanisms involved in the control of growth in chickens are too complex to be explained only under univariate analysis because all related traits are biologically correlated. Therefore, we evaluated broiler chicken performance under a multivariate approach, using the canonical discriminant analysis. A total of 1920 chicks from eight treatments, defined as the combination of four broiler chicken strains (Arbor Acres, AgRoss 308, Cobb 500 and RX) from both sexes, were housed in 48 pens. Average feed intake, average live weight, feed conversion and carcass, breast and leg weights were obtained for days 1 to 42. Canonical discriminant analysis was implemented by SAS((R)) CANDISC procedure and differences between treatments were obtained by the F-test (P < 0.05) over the squared Mahalanobis` distances. Multivariate performance from all treatments could be easily visualised because one graph was obtained from two first canonical variables, which explained 96.49% of total variation, using a SAS((R)) CONELIP macro. A clear distinction between sexes was found, where males were better than females. Also between strains, Arbor Acres, AgRoss 308 and Cobb 500 (commercial) were better than RX (experimental), Evaluation of broiler chicken performance was facilitated by the fact that the six original traits were reduced to only two canonical variables. Average live weight and carcass weight (first canonical variable) were the most important traits to discriminate treatments. The contrast between average feed intake and average live weight plus feed conversion (second canonical variable) were used to classify them. We suggest analysing performance data sets using canonical discriminant analysis.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
dc.relationAnimal
dc.rightsCopyright CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectanimal breeding
dc.subjectCANDISC procedure
dc.subjectMANOVA
dc.subjectpoultry
dc.titleCanonical discriminant analysis applied to broiler chicken performance
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución