dc.creatorBITENCOURT, J. F. S.
dc.creatorVENTIERI, A.
dc.creatorGONCALVES, K. A.
dc.creatorPIRES, E. L.
dc.creatorMITTANI, J. C.
dc.creatorTATUMI, S. H.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-19T01:09:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:48:30Z
dc.date.available2012-10-19T01:09:56Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:48:30Z
dc.date.created2012-10-19T01:09:56Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierJOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS, v.356, n.52-54, Special Issue, p.2956-2959, 2010
dc.identifier0022-3093
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17932
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.03.047
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.03.047
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1614729
dc.description.abstractNeodymium doped and undoped aluminum oxide samples were obtained using two different techniques: Pechini and sol-gel. Fine grained powders were produced using both procedures, which were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Thermo-Stimulated Luminescence (TSL). Results showed that neodymium ions incorporation is responsible for the creation of two new TSL peaks (125 and 265 degrees C) and, also, for the enhancement of the intrinsic TSL peak at 190 degrees C. An explanation was proposed for these observations. SEM gave the dimensions of the clusters produced by each method, showing that those obtained by Pechini are smaller than the ones produced by sol-gel; it can also explain the higher emission supplied by the first one. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.relationJournal of Non-crystalline Solids
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectThermo-stimulated luminescence
dc.subjectIonizing radiation
dc.subjectPechini
dc.subjectSol-gel
dc.titleA comparison between neodymium doped alumina samples obtained by Pechini and sol-gel methods using thermo-stimulated luminescence and SEM
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución