dc.creator | HIRAGA, Cynthia Y. | |
dc.creator | GARRY, Michael I. | |
dc.creator | CARSON, Richard G. | |
dc.creator | SUMMERS, Jeffery J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-18T21:21:07Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-04T14:45:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-18T21:21:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-04T14:45:23Z | |
dc.date.created | 2012-10-18T21:21:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.identifier | BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, v.205, n.1, p.10-18, 2009 | |
dc.identifier | 0166-4328 | |
dc.identifier | http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17201 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1614007 | |
dc.description.abstract | Performing two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks. While this dual-task interference is classically interpreted in terms of shared attentional resources, where two motor tasks are performed simultaneously interactions within primary motor cortex (i.e., activity-dependent coupling) may also be a contributing factor. In the present study TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) was used to examine the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference during concurrent performance of a bimanual coordination task and a discrete probe reaction time (RT) task involving the foot. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that activity-dependent coupling within the leg corticomotor pathway was greater during dual-task performance than single-task performance, and this was associated with interference on the probe RT task (i.e., increased RT). Experiment 3 revealed that dual-task interference occurred regardless of whether the dual-task involved two motor tasks or a motor and cognitive task, however activity-dependent coupling was present only when a dual motor task was performed. This suggests that activity-dependent coupling is less detrimental to performance than attentional processes operating upstream of the corticomotor system. Finally, while prioritising the RT task reduced, but did not eliminate, dual-task interference the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference was not affected by task prioritisation. This suggests that although activity-dependent coupling may contribute to dual motor-task interference, attentional processes appear to be more important. It also suggests that activity-dependent coupling may not be subject to modulation by attentional processes. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | |
dc.relation | Behavioural Brain Research | |
dc.rights | Copyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
dc.subject | Attention | |
dc.subject | Dual-task interference | |
dc.subject | Activity-dependent coupling | |
dc.subject | Transcranial magnetic stimulation | |
dc.subject | Reaction time | |
dc.subject | Bimanual coordination | |
dc.title | Dual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |