dc.creatorHIRAGA, Cynthia Y.
dc.creatorGARRY, Michael I.
dc.creatorCARSON, Richard G.
dc.creatorSUMMERS, Jeffery J.
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-18T21:21:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:45:23Z
dc.date.available2012-10-18T21:21:07Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:45:23Z
dc.date.created2012-10-18T21:21:07Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierBEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, v.205, n.1, p.10-18, 2009
dc.identifier0166-4328
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17201
dc.identifier10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.07.019
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1614007
dc.description.abstractPerforming two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks. While this dual-task interference is classically interpreted in terms of shared attentional resources, where two motor tasks are performed simultaneously interactions within primary motor cortex (i.e., activity-dependent coupling) may also be a contributing factor. In the present study TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) was used to examine the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference during concurrent performance of a bimanual coordination task and a discrete probe reaction time (RT) task involving the foot. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that activity-dependent coupling within the leg corticomotor pathway was greater during dual-task performance than single-task performance, and this was associated with interference on the probe RT task (i.e., increased RT). Experiment 3 revealed that dual-task interference occurred regardless of whether the dual-task involved two motor tasks or a motor and cognitive task, however activity-dependent coupling was present only when a dual motor task was performed. This suggests that activity-dependent coupling is less detrimental to performance than attentional processes operating upstream of the corticomotor system. Finally, while prioritising the RT task reduced, but did not eliminate, dual-task interference the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference was not affected by task prioritisation. This suggests that although activity-dependent coupling may contribute to dual motor-task interference, attentional processes appear to be more important. It also suggests that activity-dependent coupling may not be subject to modulation by attentional processes. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.relationBehavioural Brain Research
dc.rightsCopyright ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectAttention
dc.subjectDual-task interference
dc.subjectActivity-dependent coupling
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.subjectReaction time
dc.subjectBimanual coordination
dc.titleDual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución