dc.creatorMARTYNHAK, Bruno Jacson
dc.creatorLOUZADA, Fernando Mazzilli
dc.creatorPEDRAZZOLI, Mario
dc.creatorARAUJO, John Fontenele
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-18T21:20:49Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:45:09Z
dc.date.available2012-10-18T21:20:49Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:45:09Z
dc.date.created2012-10-18T21:20:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifierCHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, v.27, n.6, p.1329-1334, 2010
dc.identifier0742-0528
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/17145
dc.identifier10.3109/07420528.2010.490314
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2010.490314
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1613951
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, chronotype classification is based on the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). It is implicit in the classification that intermediate individuals get intermediate scores to most of the MEQ questions. However, a small group of individuals has a different pattern of answers. In some questions, they answer as ""morning-types"" and in some others they answer as ""evening-types,"" resulting in an intermediate total score. ""Evening-type"" and ""Morning-type"" answers were set as A(1) and A(4), respectively. Intermediate answers were set as A(2) and A(3). The following algorithm was applied: Bimodality Index = (Sigma A(1) x Sigma A(4))(2) - (Sigma A(2) x Sigma A(3))(2). Neither-types that had positive bimodality scores were classified as bimodal. If our hypothesis is validated by objective data, an update of chronotype classification will be required. (Author correspondence: brunojm@ymail.com)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherINFORMA HEALTHCARE
dc.relationChronobiology International
dc.rightsCopyright INFORMA HEALTHCARE
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.subjectBimodal
dc.subjectChronotype
dc.subjectMorning and evening oscillators
dc.titleDOES THE CHRONOTYPE CLASSIFICATION NEED TO BE UPDATED? PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución