dc.creatorWESTPHAL, Glauco A
dc.creatorSILVA, Eliezer
dc.creatorGONÇALVES, Anderson Roman
dc.creatorCALDEIRA FILHO, Milton
dc.creatorPOLI-DE-FIGUEIREDO, Luíz F
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-26T18:56:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:18:16Z
dc.date.available2012-03-26T18:56:33Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:18:16Z
dc.date.created2012-03-26T18:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierClinics, v.64, n.4, p.337-343, 2009
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/10455
dc.identifier10.1590/S1807-59322009000400012
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009000400012
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/clin/v64n4/12.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1608265
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare variations of plethysmographic wave amplitude (&#916;Ppleth) and to determine the percent difference between inspiratory and expiratory pulse pressure (&#916;Pp) cutoff values for volume responsiveness in a homogenous population of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. INTRODUCTION: Intra-thoracic pressure variations interfere with stroke volume variation. Pulse pressure variations through arterial lines during mechanical ventilation have been recommended for the estimation of fluid responsiveness. Pulse oximetry may offer a non-invasive plethysmographic method to evaluate pulse pressure; this may be useful for guiding fluid replacement. METHODS: Controlled, prospective study in cardiac surgery patients under controlled ventilation. Simultaneous digital recordings of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waves were performed. &#916;Pp, systolic pressure (&#916;Ps), DPpleth, and systolic component (&#916;Spleth) were calculated. A DPp > 13% identified fluid-responsive patients. Volume expansion was performed in responsive subjects. Systolic and amplitude components of pressure and plethysmographic waves were compared. RESULTS: In 50 measurements from 43 patients, &#916;Pp was correlated with (Ppleth (r=0.90, p<0.001), (Ps (r=0.90, p<0.001), and (Spleth (r=0.73, p<0.001). An aArea under ROC curve (AUC) identified the fluid responsiveness thresholds: (Ppleth of 11% (AUC = 0.95±0.04), (Ps of 8% (AUC=0.93±0.05), and (Spleth of 32% (AUC=0.82±0.07). A (Ppleth value > 11% predicted (Pp > 13% with 100% specificity and 91% sensitivity. Volume expansion, performed in 20 patients, changed (Pp, (Ppleth, (Ps and (Spleth significantly (p<0.008). CONCLUSIONS: &#916;Ppleth is well correlated with DPp and constitutes a simple and non-invasive method for assessing fluid responsiveness in patients following cardiac surgery.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsCopyright Faculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVolume replacement
dc.subjectHemodynamics
dc.subjectPostoperative care
dc.subjectCardiac function
dc.subjectCardiac catheterization - intervention
dc.titlePulse oximetry wave variation as a noninvasive tool to assess volume status in cardiac surgery
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución