dc.creatorSANTHIAGO, Marcony Rodrigues de
dc.creatorNETTO, Marcelo Vieira
dc.creatorBARRETO JR, Jackson
dc.creatorGOMES, Beatriz de Abreu Fiuza
dc.creatorSCHAEFER, Arthur
dc.creatorKARA-JUNIOR, Newton
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-26T18:56:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T14:18:14Z
dc.date.available2012-03-26T18:56:29Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T14:18:14Z
dc.date.created2012-03-26T18:56:29Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifierClinics, v.64, n.10, p.953-960, 2009
dc.identifier1807-5932
dc.identifierhttp://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/10447
dc.identifier10.1590/S1807-59322009001000004
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322009001000004
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/clin/v64n10/04.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1608257
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate intraindividual visual acuity, wavefront errors and modulation transfer functions in patients implanted with two diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. METHODS: This prospective study examined 40 eyes of 20 cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a spherical multifocal ReSTOR intraocular lens in one eye and an aspheric Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in the other eye. The main outcome measures, over a 3-month follow-up period, were the uncorrected photopic distance and near visual acuity and the defocus curve. The visual acuity was converted to logMAR for statistical analysis and is presented in decimal scale. The wavefront error and modulation transfer function were also evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: At the 3-month postoperative visit, the mean photopic distance uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.74 ± 0.20 in the ReSTOR group and 0.76 ± 0.22 in the Tecnis group (p=0.286). The mean near UCVA was 0.96 ± 0.10 in the ReSTOR group and 0.93 ± 0.14 in the Tecnis group (p=0.963). The binocular defocus curve showed measurements between the peaks better than 0.2 logMAR. The total aberration, higher-order aberration and coma aberration were not significantly different between the groups. The spherical aberration was significantly lower in the Tecnis group than in the ReSTOR group. (p=0.004). Both groups performed similarly for the modulation transfer function. CONCLUSION: The ReSTOR SN60D3 and Tecnis ZM 900 intraocular lenses provided similar photopic visual acuity at distance and near. The diffractive intraocular lenses studied provided a low value of coma and spherical aberrations, with the Tecnis intraocular lens having a statistically lower spherical aberration compared to the ReSTOR intraocular lens. In the 5 mm pupil diameter analyses, both intraocular lens groups showed similar modulation transfer functions.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.relationClinics
dc.rightsCopyright Faculdade de Medicina / USP
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.subjectMultifocal intraocular lenses
dc.subjectAberrometer
dc.subjectWavefront
dc.subjectModulation transfer function
dc.subjectVisual acuity
dc.titleA contralateral eye study comparing apodized diffrative and full diffrative lenses: wavefront analysis and distance and near uncorrected visual acuity
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución