dc.creatorSolís-Salazar, Martín
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T22:18:40Z
dc.date.available2017-04-03T22:18:40Z
dc.date.created2017-04-03T22:18:40Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier
dc.identifier0214-9915
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/2238/6927
dc.identifier
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of combining negative and positive items in scales in a Spanish-speaking context. Method: Three telephone surveys of 233 people each were carried out. In one survey, 15 items from the Keyes Social Well-Being Scale were worded in a positive fashion; another survey presented 8 items in a positive fashion and 7 items in terms of direct denial; and in the third survey, 7 items were worded positively, 5 were worded in negative terms using polar opposites, and 3 terms were presented in terms of direct denial. Results: The results show a greater tendency for the items in the Positive questionnaire to show results associated with the directionality of the items. However, this questionnaire shows higher values of the Cronbach’s alpha coeffi cient, and better fi t of the theoretical factor structure. Conclusions: In the survey that included only positive items, fi ndings indicated the existence of acquiescence bias. However, a remedy to this situation only made matters worse, as the combination of positive an
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherColegio Oficial de Psicologos Asturias
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/cr/
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Costa Rica
dc.sourceSalazar, M. S. (2015). The dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales. Psicothema, 27(2), 192-200.
dc.subjectPsicometría
dc.subjectEncuestas
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Psychology::Applied psychology
dc.titleThe dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución