Retrospective Analysis Of 129 Consecutive Zygomatic Implants Used To Rehabilitate Severely Resorbed Maxillae In A Two-stage Protocol

dc.creatorEvangelista Arajuo
dc.creatorRafael Tajra; Sverzut
dc.creatorAlexander Tadeu; Trivellato
dc.creatorAlexandre Elias; Sverzut
dc.creatorCassio Edvard
dc.date2017
dc.datemar-abr
dc.date2017-11-13T13:57:47Z
dc.date2017-11-13T13:57:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T06:11:09Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T06:11:09Z
dc.identifierInternational Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 32, p. 377 - 384, 2017.
dc.identifier0882-2786
dc.identifier1942-4434
dc.identifierWOS:000397969300023
dc.identifier10.11607/jomi.5136
dc.identifierhttp://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?article_id=16651#.WeoSVWhSyM8
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/330109
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1367134
dc.descriptionTo report on the clinical outcome of 129 zygomatic implants placed in 37 patients with severely resorbed partially or completely edentulous maxillae. Materials and Methods: Patients who received zygomatic implants between 2007 and 2014 were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients were treated using the same surgical protocol, the sinus slot technique. The following data were recorded: sex, age, race, medical history, etiology, addictions, degree of bone atrophy, type and size of zygomatic implants, number of implants placed, type of prosthesis, survival rate, and success of implants and complications. Follow-up included standardized clinical and tomography examinations. Results: Thirty-seven consecutive patients (25 women, 12 men; mean age 55.64 years [range 40 to 77 years]) were treated. All were in need of oral reconstruction and had maxillary atrophy that warranted zygomatic implant placement. One hundred twenty nine zygomatic implants were placed in these 37 patients. Two of the implants failed, resulting in a cumulative survival rate of 98.44%. Maxillary sinusitis was the most common complication found (21.62%); however, neither of the implant failures was related to sinusitis or smoking. Conclusion: The zygomatic implant is a reliable option for treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla.
dc.description32
dc.description2
dc.description377
dc.description384
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.publisherHanover Park
dc.relationInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectAtrophic Maxilla
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectMaxillary Sinus
dc.subjectSinusitis
dc.subjectZygomatic Implants
dc.titleRetrospective Analysis Of 129 Consecutive Zygomatic Implants Used To Rehabilitate Severely Resorbed Maxillae In A Two-stage Protocol
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución