dc.creatorGoulart
dc.creatorDouglas Rangel; Munoz
dc.creatorPablo; Cantin Lopez
dc.creatorMario Gonzalo; de Moraes
dc.creatorMarcio; Olate
dc.creatorSergio
dc.date2017
dc.datejan
dc.date2017-11-13T13:56:01Z
dc.date2017-11-13T13:56:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T06:09:30Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T06:09:30Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery . W B Saunders Co-elsevier Inc, v. 75, p. 180 - 188, 2017.
dc.identifier0278-2391
dc.identifier1531-5053
dc.identifierWOS:000391144700024
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.002
dc.identifierhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278239116308096
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/329790
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1366815
dc.descriptionTo compare the condylar volume of patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) with that of patients with a Class III skeletal relation. Materials and Methods: Twenty cone-beam computed tomograms of patients were analyzed. Images were divided into 2 groups: 10 from patients with transverse asymmetry of the face and 10 from patients with a Class III facial deformity. Patients' ages ranged from 15 to 30 years. Volumetric data were reconstructed using Dolphin 3D software (Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, CA). This software measured the condylar volume above the deepest point of the sigmoid notch, the lower arch midline deviation, and the overjet. Results: The condyle with hyperplasia exhibited the largest volume (1.97 +/- 0.52 cm(3)) and a statistically significant difference compared with the contralateral condyle (chi(2) = 14.30; P <.01). The Class III condyle exhibited relative symmetry of volume between the left and right sides. These condyles exhibited a larger volume compared with the non-hyperplastic condyles in the UCH group, with a statistically significant difference (chi(2) = 6.22; P =.013; chi(2) = 5.50; P =.019). Conclusions: Hyperplastic condyles were similar in volume to the condyles of patients with mandibular prognathism, suggesting that patients with a Class III skeletal relation could exhibit bilateral condylar hyperplasia. (C) 2016 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
dc.description75
dc.description1
dc.description180
dc.description188
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherW B Saunders CO-Elsevier INC
dc.publisherPhiladelphia
dc.relationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectBeam Computed-tomography;mandibular Condyle;images
dc.titleComparative Evaluation Of Condylar Volume Between Patients With Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia And Class Iii Dentofacial Deformity
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución