dc.creatorPrado
dc.creatorFelippe Bevilacqua; Freire
dc.creatorAlexandre Rodrigues; Rossi
dc.creatorAna Claudia; Ledogar
dc.creatorJustin A.; Smith
dc.creatorAmanda L.; Dechow
dc.creatorPaul C.; Strait
dc.creatorDavid S.; Voigt
dc.creatorTilman; Ross
dc.creatorCallum F.
dc.date2016
dc.datedez
dc.date2017-11-13T13:51:02Z
dc.date2017-11-13T13:51:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T06:07:31Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T06:07:31Z
dc.identifierAnatomical Record-advances In Integrative Anatomy And Evolutionary Biology. Wiley-blackwell, v. 299, p. 1753 - 1778, 2016.
dc.identifier1932-8486
dc.identifier1932-8494
dc.identifierWOS:000388216800013
dc.identifier10.1002/ar.23486
dc.identifierhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.23486/abstract;jsessionid=4136D4FA9D88E5030529F7BD851D9779.f03t04
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/329325
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1366350
dc.descriptionThe craniofacial skeleton is often described in the clinical literature as being comprised of vertical bony pillars, which transmit forces from the toothrow to the neurocranium as axial compressive stresses, reinforced transversely by buttresses. Here, we review the literature on bony microarchitecture, in vivo bone strain, and finite-element modeling of the facial skeleton of humans and nonhuman primates to address questions regarding the structural and functional existence of facial pillars and buttresses. Available bone material properties data do not support the existence of pillars and buttresses in humans or Sapajus apella. Deformation regimes in the zygomatic complex emphasize bending and shear, therefore conceptualizing the zygomatic complex of humans or nonhuman primates as a pillar obscures its patterns of stress, strain, and deformation. Human fossil relatives and chimpanzees exhibit strain regimes corroborating the existence of a canine-frontal pillar, but the notion of a zygomatic pillar has no support. The emerging consensus on patterns of strain and deformation in finite element models (FEMs) of the human facial skeleton corroborates hypotheses in the clinical literature regarding zygomatic complex function, and provide new insights into patterns of failure of titanium and resorbable plates in experimental studies. It is suggested that the "pillar and buttress" model of human craniofacial skeleton function be replaced with FEMs that more accurately and precisely represent in vivo function, and which can serve as the basis for future research into implants used in restoration of occlusal function and fracture repair. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.description299
dc.description12
dc.description1753
dc.description1778
dc.descriptionNational Science Foundation Physical Anthropology HOMINID [NSF BCS 0725219, 0725183, 0725147, 0725141, 0725136, 0725126, 0725122, 0725078]
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.publisherHoboken
dc.relationAnatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectPillars
dc.subjectButtresses
dc.subjectZygomatic Fractures
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.subjectZygomaticomaxillary Complex
dc.titleReview Of In Vivo Bone Strain Studies And Finite Element Models Of The Zygomatic Complex In Humans And Nonhuman Primates: Implications For Clinical Research And Practice
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución