Artículos de revistas
In Vitro Study Of The Role Of Thrombin In Platelet Rich Plasma (prp) Preparation: Utility For Gel Formation And Impact In Growth Factors Release
Registro en:
Journal Of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine. Journal Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine, v. 12, p. P2 - P9, 2016.
0973-7154
WOS:000389046400002
Autor
Huber
S. C.; Cunha
J. L.; Montalvao
S. A. L.; da Silva
L. Q.; Paffaro
A. U.; da Silva
F. A. R.; Rodrigues
B. L.; Lana
J. F. S. D.; Annichino-Bizzacchi
J. M.
Institución
Resumen
The use of PRP has been studied for different fields, with promising results in regenerative medicine. Until now, there is no study in the literature evaluating thrombin levels in serum, used as autologous thrombin preparation. Therefore, in the present study we evaluated the role played by different thrombin concentrations in PRP and the impact in the release of growth factors. Also, different activators for PRP gel formation were evaluated. Methods: Thrombin levels were measured in different autologous preparations: serum, L-PRP (PRP rich in leukocytes) and T-PRP (thrombin produced through PRP added calcium gluconate). L-PRP was prepared according to the literature, with platelets and leukocytes being quantified. The effect of autologous thrombin associated or not with calcium in PRP gel was determined by measuring the time of gel formation. The relationship between thrombin concentration and release of growth factors was determined by growth factors (PDGF-AA, VEGF and EGF) multiplex analysis. Results: A similar concentration of thrombin was observed in serum, L-PRP and TPRP (8.13 nM, 8.63 nM and 7.56 nM, respectively) with a high variation between individuals (CV%: 35.07, 43 and 58.42, respectively). T-PRP and serum with calcium chloride showed similar results in time to promote gel formation. The increase of thrombin concentrations (2.66, 8 and 24 nM) did not promote an increase in growth factor release. Conclusions: The technique of using serum as a thrombin source proved to be the most efficient and reproducible for promoting PRP gel formation, with some advantages when compared to other activation methods, as this technique is easier and quicker with no need of consuming part of PRP. Noteworthy, PRP activation using different thrombin concentrations did not promote a higher release of growth factors, appearing not to be necessary when PRP is used as a suspension. 12 1 P2 P9