Development Of Infants With A Risk Indicator For Hearing Loss Associated To Living Enviroment

dc.creatorAraujo D.M.
dc.creatorRovere N.C.
dc.creatorLima M.C.M.P.
dc.date2017
dc.date2017-08-17T19:16:32Z
dc.date2017-08-17T19:16:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T05:24:16Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T05:24:16Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Human Growth And Development. Centro De Estudos De Crescimento E Desenvolvimento Do Ser Humano, v. 27, n. 1, p. 49 - 55, 2017.
dc.identifier0104-1282
dc.identifier10.7322/jhgd.127652
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017543485&doi=10.7322%2fjhgd.127652&partnerID=40&md5=968378f9f33cadae028c8a28f645ec1e
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/324011
dc.identifier2-s2.0-85017543485
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1358174
dc.descriptionInfants with a risk indicator of hearing loss (RIHL) are more likely to have delays in their development. Besides the biological risk, the infant's environment may determine the outcome of their development. Objective: To compare the motor, cognitive and language development of infants with and without RIHL and to know the affordances of the home environment of those infants. Methods: This was an observational research exploratory, cross-sectional and quantitative study, in which the development of 77 infants with RIHL (Study Group) were compared to 77 infants without RIHL (Compared Group). Cognition, language and motricity were evaluated according to the Bayley Scale of Infant Development, and the home environment according to the Affordability of the Home Environment for Motor Development - Baby Scale questionnaire. Results: The most frequent risk indicators were family history (25.6%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (24.4%). In the Study Group, 13 (16.8%) infants presented delays in at least one domain and in the Control Group 3 (3.9%) infants presented delays. There was a statistically significant difference in the motor (p = 0.0001), cognitive (p = 0.001) and language (p = 0.0304) domains, with a better score in the Control Group. Regarding the home environment, 70.2% of houses in the Study Group were classified as less than adequate or mildly adequate, while in the Control Group this was 50.7%. Conclusion: The average development of the infants with risk indicators for hearing loss is below the average development of infants without them. Also, the number of environments below adequate is higher in the group with infants with risk indicators.
dc.description27
dc.description1
dc.description49
dc.description55
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherCentro de Estudos de Crescimento e Desenvolvimento do Ser Humano
dc.relationJournal of Human Growth and Development
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectHearing Impairment
dc.subjectInfant Development
dc.subjectInfants
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.titleDevelopment Of Infants With A Risk Indicator For Hearing Loss Associated To Living Enviroment
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución