dc.creatorRidenti M.
dc.date2016
dc.date2017-08-17T19:10:12Z
dc.date2017-08-17T19:10:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T05:15:07Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T05:15:07Z
dc.identifierBulletin Of Latin American Research. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, p. 1 - 10, 2016.
dc.identifier0261-3050
dc.identifier10.1111/blar.12519
dc.identifierhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978766633&doi=10.1111%2fblar.12519&partnerID=40&md5=c263750cb17b3d572e41b8a7d72aa33f
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/322976
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84978766633
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1357139
dc.descriptionThis article highlights the renewed interest in the history of the coup of 1964 and the dictatorship that followed in Brazil, as well as some debates involved in the production of memoirs, investigative journalism and academic research on the topic. It analyses at more length one of the polemics: the increasing use of the term 'civilian-military' to qualify the coup, the rule, and the dictatorship. It argues that - independent of the use of the term - the most important aspect is to understand the complex relationship between the military and civilians as part of a broader process of conservative modernisation during this period. © 2016 Society for Latin American Studies.
dc.description1
dc.description10
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.relationBulletin of Latin American Research
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject1964 Coup
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectDictatorship
dc.subjectHistoriography
dc.subjectMilitary
dc.subjectModernisation
dc.titleThe Debate Over Military (or Civilian-military?) Dictatorship In Brazil In Historiographical Context
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución