dc.creatorPetrini
dc.creatorMA; Rocha
dc.creatorJV; Brown
dc.creatorJC; Bispo
dc.creatorRC
dc.date2016
dc.date2016-12-06T18:30:04Z
dc.date2016-12-06T18:30:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T02:02:39Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T02:02:39Z
dc.identifier1873-5754
dc.identifierLand Use Policy. ELSEVIER SCI LTD, n. 51, p. 85 - 94.
dc.identifier0264-8377
dc.identifierWOS:000369555700009
dc.identifier10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.029
dc.identifierhttp://www-sciencedirect-com.ez88.periodicos.capes.gov.br/science/article/pii/S0264837715003403
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319947
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1310713
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionIn Brazil, some see intensive, large-scale production of sugarcane-based ethanol, based on a model of capital and land concentration, as a threat to the survival of family farming. Family farmers are increasingly under pressure to sell or rent land to mills where sugarcane monoculture is expanding. In this context, the government is working to formulate or change public policies in order to support farmer livelihoods in sugarcane growing regions. The present study is based on research conducted in the municipality of Ipiranga de Goias, Goias State, Brazil. It employs the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, with participation of stakeholders at federal, state and municipal levels, to support public policy decision-making addressing family farming. The stakeholders prioritize environmental and economic benefits as the most important criteria requiring the attention of policy makers. Also, stakeholders agree that diversification of production is the most appropriate alternative for strengthening family farming. The AHP approach can be the starting point in the formulation of public policies. The approach helps ensure transparency, and it purposefully includes family farmer points of view. Policies derived from this process, therefore, may have a higher likelihood of being supported and accepted by farmers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description51
dc.description
dc.description85
dc.description94
dc.descriptionFeagri/Proap/Capes
dc.descriptionUnicamp/Faepex [519.292-0556/14]
dc.descriptionCapes (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel)
dc.descriptionNSF-BCS-GSS [1227160]
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.publisherOXFORD
dc.relationLand Use Policy
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectAnalytic Hierarchy Process
dc.subjectDecision-making
dc.subjectMultiple Stakeholders
dc.subjectFamily Farming
dc.subjectSugarcane
dc.titleUsing An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach To Prioritize Public Policies Addressing Family Farming In Brazil
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución