dc.creatorQueiroz
dc.creatorPM; Nascimento
dc.creatorHAR; da Paz
dc.creatorTDJ; Anacleto
dc.creatorFN; Freitas
dc.creatorDQ
dc.date2016
dc.date2016-12-06T18:29:43Z
dc.date2016-12-06T18:29:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T02:02:14Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T02:02:14Z
dc.identifier1878-3554
dc.identifierJournal Of Endodontics. ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, n. 42, n. 6, p. 896 - 899.
dc.identifier1878-3554
dc.identifierWOS:000377821200010
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.003
dc.identifierhttp://www-sciencedirect-com.ez88.periodicos.capes.gov.br/science/article/pii/S0099239916300309
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/319845
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1310611
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionIntroduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital subtraction radiography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs). Methods: Twenty decoronated uniradicular human teeth. were placed in the alveoli of a dry mandible and radio-graphed twice, first without (unfilled roots) and then with (filled roots) a gutta-percha cone placed into the root canal. Roots were then removed from the dry mandible, and vertical fractures were created with the aid of a universal testing machine. The fractured roots were repositioned in the mandibular alveoli and again radiographed twice. Radiographic images were subtracted by using the Regeemy software in 3 test situations: group 1, initial radiographic images of unfilled roots and images of fractured or non-fractured unfilled roots; group 2, initial radiographic images of unfilled roots and images of fractured or non-fractured filled roots; and group 3, initial radiographic images of filled roots and images of fractured or non-fractured filled roots. Three examiners evaluated all the original digital radiographs, as well as the subtracted images, for the presence or absence of VRFs. Numerical data were subject to statistical analysis with the use of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The areas under the ROC curve for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 0.86, 0.73, and 0.66, respectively. For the original digital radiographs, areas under the ROC curve were 0.80 (without gutta-percha) and 0.73 (with gutta-percha). No statistically significant differences were found between subtracted and original images. Conclusions: Digital subtraction radiography could be considered as an alternative tool for the investigation of VRFs because of its comparable diagnostic accuracy to existing methods.
dc.description42
dc.description
dc.description896
dc.description899
dc.descriptionCAPES, Brazil
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.publisherNEW YORK
dc.relationJournal Of Endodontics
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectDigital Subtraction Radiography (dsr)
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectVertical Root Fracture
dc.titleAccuracy Of Digital Subtraction Radiography In The Detection Of Vertical Root Fractures
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución