dc.creatorBITTAR, Cintia Kelly
dc.creatorCLIQUET JR., Alberto
dc.creatorFLOETER, Michelle dos Santos
dc.date2011
dc.date2013-07-26T17:57:42Z
dc.date2016-07-01T15:12:51Z
dc.date2013-07-26T17:57:42Z
dc.date2016-07-01T15:12:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:55:29Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:55:29Z
dc.identifierAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, v.90, n.6, p.477-481, 2011
dc.identifier0894-9115
dc.identifier10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821a7386
dc.identifierhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?Func=Frame&product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=EndNote&UT=000290433200005&Init=Yes&SrcAuth=ResearchSoft&mode=FullRecord
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821a7386
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/386
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/386
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1308810
dc.descriptionBittar CK, Cliquet A Jr, dos Santos Floter M: Utility of quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in diagnosing osteoporosis in spinal cord injury patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90:477-481. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the utility of quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in diagnosing osteoporosis in spinal cord injury patients in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. Design: This is a diagnostic test criterion standard comparison study. Between January 2008 and October 2009, the bone density of 15 spinal cord injury patients was assessed for analysis before beginning rehabilitation using muscle stimulation. The bone density was assessed using bone densitometry examination (DEXA) and ultrasound examination of the calcaneus (QUS). The measurements acquired using QUS and DEXA were compared between patients with spinal cord injury and a control group of ten healthy individuals. Results: The T-score values for femoral neck using DEXA (P < 0.0022) and those using QUS of the calcaneus (P < 0.0005) differed significantly between the groups, and the means in the normal subjects were higher than those in spinal cord injury patients who would receive electrical stimulation. In spinal cord injury patients, the significant differences were found between the QUS T-score for calcaneus and the DEXA scores for the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Conclusions: Because of the low level of mechanical stress on the calcaneus, the results of the QUS could not be correlated with the DEXA results for diagnosing osteoporosis. Therefore, QUS seems to be not a good choice for diagnosis and follow-up.
dc.description90
dc.description6
dc.description477
dc.description481
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.publisherEstados Unidos
dc.relationAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rightsCopyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectElectrical Stimulation Therapy
dc.subjectSpinal Cord Injuries
dc.subjectCalcaneus/Ultrasonography
dc.subjectOsteoporosis
dc.subjectBONE-MINERAL DENSITY
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.titleUtility of Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus in Diagnosing Osteoporosis in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución