dc.creatorFranz-Montan, M.
dc.creatorde Paula, E.
dc.creatorGroppo, F. C.
dc.creatorSilva, A. L. R.
dc.creatorRanali, J.
dc.creatorVolpato, M. C.
dc.date2012
dc.date2013-09-19T18:06:35Z
dc.date2016-07-01T14:42:01Z
dc.date2013-09-19T18:06:35Z
dc.date2016-07-01T14:42:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:54:41Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:54:41Z
dc.identifierBritish Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. Churchill Livingstone, v.50, n.1, p.60-64, 2012
dc.identifier0266-4356
dc.identifierWOS:000299986700012
dc.identifier10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.10.018
dc.identifierhttp://www.repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/2282
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/2282
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1308606
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionAn effective topical agent to reduce pain during local anaesthesia of the palate is not yet available. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of liposome-encapsulated ropivacaine in different concentrations for topical anaesthesia of the palatal mucosa. In this single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study 40 (20 male) healthy volunteers were randomised to be given: liposome-encapsulated 2% ropivacaine, liposome-encapsulated 1% ropivacaine, a eutectic mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine (EMLA), and liposomal placebo gel, topically on to the palatal mucosa of the right canine region for 5 min each, at four different sessions. Pain associated with insertion of a 30G needle, and with injection of a local anaesthetic, was rated on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The effect of liposomal ropivacaine 1% and 2% did not differ from that of placebo (p = 0.3 and p = 0.1, respectively) in reducing pain during insertion of the needle. Lower VAS were obtained with EMLA. In this group VAS were lower in women than men (p = 0.007). There was no difference in VAS among groups (p = 0.3) as far as injection of the local anaesthetic was concerned. In conclusion, liposomal-encapsulated ropivacaine formulations did not reduce the pain of insertion of a needle into the palatal mucosa. None of the anaesthetic formulations tested, including the positive control (EMLA), were effective in reducing the pain of an injection of local anaesthetic compared with placebo. (C) 2010 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description50
dc.description1
dc.description60
dc.description64
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.publisherEdinburgh
dc.relationBritish Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectLocal anaesthetics
dc.subjectRopivacaine
dc.subjectOral mucosa
dc.subjectIn vivo
dc.subjectAnaesthetic efficacy
dc.subjectENCAPSULATED TETRACAINE
dc.subjectORAL-MUCOSA
dc.subjectEMLA
dc.subjectSKIN
dc.subjectROPIVACAINE
dc.subjectLIDOCAINE
dc.subjectEFFICACY
dc.titleLiposomal delivery system for topical anaesthesia of the palatal mucosa
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución