dc.creatorPinto de Oliveira
dc.creatorJ. C.
dc.date2015-APR
dc.date2016-06-07T13:33:11Z
dc.date2016-06-07T13:33:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:48:56Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:48:56Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierCarnap, Kuhn, And The History Of Science: A Reply To Thomas Uebel. Springer, v. 46, p. 215-223 APR-2015.
dc.identifier0925-4560
dc.identifierWOS:000354086600015
dc.identifier10.1007/s10838-014-9277-1
dc.identifierhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10838-014-9277-1
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/243639
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1307337
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this article is to respond to Thomas Uebel's criticisms of my comments regarding the current revisionism of Carnap's work and its relations to Kuhn. I begin by pointing out some misunderstandings in the interpretation of my article. I then discuss some aspects related to Carnap's view of the history of science. First, I emphasize that it was not due to a supposed affinity between Kuhn's conceptions and those of logical positivists that Kuhn was invited to write the monograph on the history of science for the Encyclopedia. Three other authors had been invited first, including George Sarton whose conception was entirely different from Kuhn's. In addition, I try to show that Carnap attributes little importance to the history of science. He seldom refers to it and, when he does, he clearly defends (like Sarton) a Whig or an 'old' historiography of science, to which Kuhn opposes his "new historiography of science". It is argued that this raises serious difficulties for those, like Uebel, who hold the view that Carnap includes the historical or the social within the rational.
dc.description46
dc.description1
dc.description
dc.description215
dc.description223
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.publisher
dc.publisherDORDRECHT
dc.relationJOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectHistory & Philosophy Of Science
dc.titleCarnap, Kuhn, And The History Of Science: A Reply To Thomas Uebel
dc.typeArtículos de revistas
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución