dc.creatorPinto
dc.creatorCristiane Franco; Vermelho
dc.creatorPaulo Moreira; Aguiar
dc.creatorThaiane Rodrigues; Paes Leme
dc.creatorAdriana Franco; de Oliveira
dc.creatorMarcelo Tavares; de Souza
dc.creatorEvelise Machado; Cavalli
dc.creatorVanessa; Giannini
dc.creatorMarcelo
dc.date2015
dc.date2016-06-07T13:32:47Z
dc.date2016-06-07T13:32:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:48:32Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:48:32Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierEnamel And Dentin Bond Strength, Interfacial Ultramorphology And Fluoride Ion Release Of Self-etching Adhesives During A Ph-cycling Regime. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 17, p. 27-34 2015.
dc.identifier1461-5185
dc.identifierWOS:000353238700004
dc.identifier10.3290/j.jad.a33343
dc.identifierhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/270910452_Enamel_and_Dentin_Bond_Strength_Interfacial_Ultramorphology_and_Fluoride_Ion_Release_of_Self-etching_Adhesives_During_a_pH-cycling_Regime
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/243538
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1307236
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionPurpose: This study evaluated the effects of pH cycling on fluoride release and bond strength of two self-etching adhesive systems to both enamel and dentin. The ultramorphology of the interfaces produced by the adhesive systems were also analyzed. Materials and Methods: The buccal surfaces of bovine incisors were flattened to expose enamel and dentin, which were bonded with either Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB) or One-Up Bond F Plus (OBP). The bonded samples were prepared for microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) testing, fluoride ion release, and transmission electron microscopy. pH cycling comprised demineralization (8 h/day) and remineralization (16 h/day) cycles for 8 days. The mu TBS data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, while fluoride release was analyzed using the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests. Results: The adhesives presented similar bond strengths to enamel. However, the dentin bond strength of CPB was higher than that of OBP. pH cycling did not influence enamel or dentin mu TBS. The amount of fluoride released from the bonded enamel and dentin was low and varied among the groups. The morphological evaluation showed that the thickness of the dentin hybrid layers was similar for both adhesives. Conclusion: The pH-cycling regime did not affect enamel or dentin bond strengths. In enamel, both the self-etching adhesives tested presented similar bond strengths, but in dentin, Clearfil Protect Bond showed higher dentin bonding than One-Up Bond F Plus.
dc.description17
dc.description1
dc.description
dc.description27
dc.description34
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.descriptionConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.descriptionFAPESP [06/53828-2]
dc.descriptionCNPq [303587/2007-5]
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.languageen
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.publisher
dc.publisherHANOVER PARK
dc.relationJOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectSecondary Caries Formation
dc.subjectSingle-step
dc.subjectRoot Dentin
dc.subjectIn-situ
dc.subjectSystems
dc.subjectWater
dc.subjectAntibacterial
dc.subjectRestorations
dc.subjectNanoleakage
dc.subjectComposites
dc.titleEnamel And Dentin Bond Strength, Interfacial Ultramorphology And Fluoride Ion Release Of Self-etching Adhesives During A Ph-cycling Regime
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución