Diagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders: Self-instruction Or Formal Training And Calibration?

dc.creatorReis Vilanova
dc.creatorLarissa Soares; Matheus Rodrigues Garcia
dc.creatorRenata Cunha; List
dc.creatorThomas; Alstergren
dc.creatorPer
dc.date2015-Mar
dc.date2016-06-07T13:21:11Z
dc.date2016-06-07T13:21:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:41:05Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:41:05Z
dc.identifier
dc.identifierDiagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders: Self-instruction Or Formal Training And Calibration?. Springer-verlag Italia Srl, v. 16, p. Mar-2015.
dc.identifier1129-2369
dc.identifierWOS:000352809100001
dc.identifier10.1186/s10194-015-0505-9
dc.identifierhttp://thejournalofheadacheandpain.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s10194-015-0505-9
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/243040
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1306738
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionBackground: To investigate the difference in diagnostic reliability between self-instructed examiners and examiners taught in a Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) course and if the reliability of self-instructed examiners improves after the course. Methods: Six examiners were divided into three groups: (1) formal two-day training and calibration course at a DC/TMD training center (Course group), (2) self-teaching through documents and movie (Self group) with three examiners on each and the Self group later participated in the course (Self + course group). Each group examined sixteen subjects, total of 48 volunteers (36 patients with TMD and 12 asymptomatic) and the reliabilities in relation to the diagnoses derived by a Reference Standard Examiner were compared by Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Results: The reliability was good to excellent in all three groups of examiners for all DC/TMD diagnoses, except for Myofascial pain with referral in the Self + course group. The course seemed to improve the reliability regarding Myalgia and Arthralgia at the same time as the examiners experienced the course to be valuable for self-perceived ability and confidence. Conclusions: This study shows that the diagnostic reliability of formal DC/TMD training and calibration and DC/TMD self-instruction are similar, except for subgroups of Myalgia. Thus, self-instruction seems to be possible to use to diagnose the most common TMDs in general dental practice. The course further improves the reliability regarding Myalgia and Arthralgia at the same time as the examiners experienced the course to be valuable for self-perceived ability and confidence.
dc.description16
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.descriptionCAPES [10225/13-7]
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
dc.publisher
dc.publisherMILAN
dc.relationJOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN
dc.rightsaberto
dc.sourceWOS
dc.subjectAxis I Diagnoses
dc.subjectMuscle Disorders
dc.subjectOrofacial Pain
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectSigns
dc.subjectExaminers
dc.subjectAgreement
dc.subjectRdc/tmd
dc.subjectKappa
dc.subjectTmd
dc.titleDiagnostic Criteria For Temporomandibular Disorders: Self-instruction Or Formal Training And Calibration?
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución