dc.creatorReis, Ana Luiza
dc.creatorReis, Leonardo Oliveira
dc.creatorSaade, Ricardo Destro
dc.creatorSantos, Carlos Alberto
dc.creatorLima, Marcelo Lopes de
dc.creatorFregonesi, Adriano
dc.date
dc.date2016-05-23T19:43:02Z
dc.date2016-05-23T19:43:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:30:13Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:30:13Z
dc.identifierInternational Braz J Urol : Official Journal Of The Brazilian Society Of Urology. v. 41, n. 1, p. 155-167
dc.identifier1677-6119
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928522
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/235874
dc.identifier25928522
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1304117
dc.descriptionTo validate the Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) considering Brazilian social-cultural aspects. To determine equivalence between the Portuguese and the English QEQ versions, the Portuguese version was back-translated by two professors who are native English speakers. After language equivalence had been determined, urologists considered the QEQ Portuguese version suitable. Men with self-reported erectile dysfunction (ED) and infertile men who had a stable sexual relationship for at least 6 months were invited to answer the QEQ, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). The questionnaires were presented together and answered without help in a private room. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (Spearman), convergent validity (Spearman correlation) coefficients and known-groups validity (the ability of the QEQ Portuguese version to differentiate erectile dysfunction severity groups) were assessed. We recruited 197 men (167 ED patients and 30 non-ED patients), mean age of 53.3 and median of 55.5 years (23-82 years). The Portuguese version of the QEQ had high internal consistency (Cronbach α=0.93), high stability between test and retest (ICC 0.83, with IC 95%: 0.76-0.88, p<0.001) and Spearman correlation coefficient r=0.82 (p<0.001), which demonstrated the high correlation between the QEQ and IIEF results. The correlations between the QEQ and RAND-36 were significantly low in ED (r=0.20, p=0.01) and non-ED patients (r=0.37, p=0.04). The QEQ Portuguese version presented good psychometric properties and high convergent validity in relation to IIEF. The low correlations between the QEQ and the RAND-36, as well as between the IIEF and the RAND-36 indicated IIEF and QEQ specificity, which may have resulted from the patients' psychological adaptations that minimized the impact of ED on Quality of Life (QoL) and reestablished the well-being feeling.
dc.description41
dc.description155-167
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Braz J Urol : Official Journal Of The Brazilian Society Of Urology
dc.relationInt Braz J Urol
dc.rightsfechado
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 And Over
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectCross-cultural Comparison
dc.subjectErectile Dysfunction
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLanguage
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPenile Erection
dc.subjectPersonal Satisfaction
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectQuality Of Life
dc.subjectReproducibility Of Results
dc.subjectSeverity Of Illness Index
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectSurveys And Questionnaires
dc.subjectTranslations
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleValidation Of Portuguese Version Of Quality Of Erection Questionnaire (qeq) And Comparison To International Index Of Erectile Function (iief) And Rand 36-item Health Survey.
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución