dc.creatorCredidio, Débora Castilho
dc.creatorPellegrino, Jordão
dc.creatorCastilho, Lilian
dc.date2011
dc.date2015-11-27T13:22:09Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:22:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:14:21Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:14:21Z
dc.identifierImmunohematology / American Red Cross. v. 27, n. 1, p. 6-11, 2011.
dc.identifier1930-3955
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22356480
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/199744
dc.identifier22356480
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1299977
dc.descriptionRh discrepancies are a problem during routine testing because of partial D or weak D phenotypes. Panels of monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) are being developed to identify D variants such as partial D and weak D when there are anomalous D typing results; however, molecular characterization offers a more specific classification of weak and partial D. The weak D and partial D phenotypes are caused by many different RHD alleles encoding aberrant D proteins, resulting in distinct serologic phenotypes and the possibility of anti-D immunization. We evaluated currently used serologic methods and reagents to detect and identify D variants and correlated the results with molecular analyses. A total of 306 blood samples from Brazilian blood donors and patients with discrepant results in routine D typing were analyzed. In total, 166 (54.2%) weak D, 136 (44.4%) partial D, 3 (1%) DEL, and 1 (0.3%) DHAR variants were identified. Among weak D samples, 76 weak D type 1 (45.8%), 75 weak D type 2 (45.2%), 13 weak D type 3 (7.8%), and 2 weak D type 5 (1.2%) alleles were found. Among the partial D samples, 49 type 4.0 weak partial D (36%), 9 DAR (6.6%), 24 DFR (17.6%), 6 DBT (4.4%), 1 DHMi (0.73%), 26 DVI (19%), 14 DVa (10.3%), 5 DIVb (3.7%), and 2 DVII (1.5%) were observed. Two samples identified as DEL by adsorption-elution were characterized by molecular analyses as RHD(IVS5–38DEL4) and one sample was characterized as RHD(K409K). One sample was characterized as DHAR, a CE variant positive with some monoclonal anti-D. Our results showed that the use of different methods and anti-D reagents in the serologic routine analysis revealed D variants that can be further investigated. Molecular methods can help to differentiate between partial D and weak D and to characterize the weak D types, providing additional information of value in the determination of D phenotypes. This distinction is important for optimized management of D– RBC units and for the prevention of anti-D–related hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.
dc.description27
dc.description6-11
dc.languageeng
dc.relationImmunohematology / American Red Cross
dc.relationImmunohematology
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectBlood Donors
dc.subjectBlood Grouping And Crossmatching
dc.subjectBlood Transfusion
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectDna Mutational Analysis
dc.subjectGene Frequency
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIsoantibodies
dc.subjectMutation
dc.subjectPolymorphism, Genetic
dc.subjectProtein Binding
dc.subjectRh Isoimmunization
dc.subjectRh-hr Blood-group System
dc.titleSerologic And Molecular Characterization Of D Variants In Brazilians: Impact For Typing And Transfusion Strategy.
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución