Cervical Restoration And The Amount Of Soft Tissue Coverage Achieved By Coronally Advanced Flap: A 2-year Follow-up Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial.

dc.creatorSantamaria, Mauro Pedrine
dc.creatorda Silva Feitosa, Daniela
dc.creatorNociti, Francisco Humberto
dc.creatorCasati, Marcio Zaffalon
dc.creatorSallum, Antonio Wilson
dc.creatorSallum, Enilson Antônio
dc.date2009-May
dc.date2015-11-27T13:15:10Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:15:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:08:44Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:08:44Z
dc.identifierJournal Of Clinical Periodontology. v. 36, n. 5, p. 434-41, 2009-May.
dc.identifier1600-051X
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01389.x
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19419445
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/198294
dc.identifier19419445
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1298527
dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year follow-up success of the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions by a coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone or in combination with a resin-modified glass ionomer restoration (CAF+R). Sixteen patients with bilateral Miller Class I buccal gingival recessions, associated with non-carious cervical lesions, were selected. The defects received either CAF or CAF+R. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL) and cervical lesion height (CLH) coverage were measured at the baseline and 6, 12 and 24 months after the treatment. Both groups showed statistically significant gains in CAL and soft tissue coverage. The differences between groups were not statistically significant in BOP, PD, RGR and CAL, after 2 years. The percentages of CLH covered were 51.57 +/- 17.2% for CAF+R and 53.87 +/- 12.6% for CAF (p>0.05). The estimated root coverage was 80.37 +/- 25.44% for CAF+R and 83.46 +/- 20.79% for CAF (p>0.05). Within the limits of the present study, it can be concluded that both procedures provide acceptable soft tissue coverage after 2 years, with no significant differences between the two approaches.
dc.description36
dc.description434-41
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology
dc.relationJ. Clin. Periodontol.
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectBicuspid
dc.subjectCuspid
dc.subjectDental Restoration, Permanent
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow-up Studies
dc.subjectGingival Hemorrhage
dc.subjectGingival Recession
dc.subjectGingivoplasty
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cements
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPeriodontal Attachment Loss
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectRoot Planing
dc.subjectSurgical Flaps
dc.subjectTooth Cervix
dc.subjectTooth Diseases
dc.subjectTooth Root
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleCervical Restoration And The Amount Of Soft Tissue Coverage Achieved By Coronally Advanced Flap: A 2-year Follow-up Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial.
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución