[autologous Versus Synthetic Sling Procedure: Success Rate And Bladder Outlet Obstruction Rates].

dc.creatorNatalin, Ricardo A
dc.creatorRiccetto, Cassio
dc.creatorNardi Pedro, Renato
dc.creatorPrudente, Alessandro
dc.creatorSalvador Navarrete, Guillermo
dc.creatorRodrigues Palma, Paulo C
dc.date2009-Feb
dc.date2015-11-27T13:15:10Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:15:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:08:44Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:08:44Z
dc.identifierActas Urologicas Españolas. v. 33, n. 2, p. 154-8, 2009-Feb.
dc.identifier0210-4806
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19418839
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/198293
dc.identifier19418839
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1298526
dc.descriptionVoiding dysfunction and urinary retention were frequent complications of sling. More recently synthetic supplies such as polypropylene mesh have been included in the armamentarium for sub urethral support. A prospective non randomized study was conducted. Sling procedure was performed in 436 consecutive patients with SUI. Patients were divided in groups according to mesh type, being 210 on autologous and 226 on synthetic. Patients were surveyed on voiding condition, continence and satisfaction. Surgical results were assessed according to Blaivas classification. Results were considered significant p<0.05. Mean patient age was 48.4 years. Mean operative time for autologous sling was of 107.6 min versus 20.6 min for synthetic. Mean hospitalization was 36h on autologous versus 24h on synthetic and mean follow up was 25 months. We found 87.1% and 92.9% of patients continent in autologous and synthetic group, respectively. Failure was presented by 7% in autologous and 4.8% in synthetic group (p=0.1961). The global rate of BOO was of 4.5% (20/436), when analysed by groups we found on autologous a rate of 8.5% (18/210), compared to 0.9% on synthetics (2/226) (p=0.000126). Autologous and synthetic slings presented comparable success rates, however BOO was more common among patients treated by autologous slings.
dc.description33
dc.description154-8
dc.languagespa
dc.relationActas Urologicas Españolas
dc.relationActas Urol Esp
dc.rightsfechado
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectProsthesis Design
dc.subjectRemission Induction
dc.subjectSuburethral Slings
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence, Stress
dc.title[autologous Versus Synthetic Sling Procedure: Success Rate And Bladder Outlet Obstruction Rates].
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución