dc.creator | de Silva, André Luís Faria | |
dc.creator | Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite | |
dc.creator | de Souza, Grace Mendonça Dias | |
dc.creator | dos Santos, Carlos Tadeu Dias | |
dc.creator | Paulillo, Luís Alexandre Maffei Sartini | |
dc.date | | |
dc.date | 2015-11-27T13:05:54Z | |
dc.date | 2015-11-27T13:05:54Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-29T01:03:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-29T01:03:35Z | |
dc.identifier | Operative Dentistry. v. 31, n. 5, p. 562-8 | |
dc.identifier | 0361-7734 | |
dc.identifier | 10.2341/05-98 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17024944 | |
dc.identifier | http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/196967 | |
dc.identifier | 17024944 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1297200 | |
dc.description | This study evaluated microtensile bond strength (pTBS) when an additional adhesive layer was applied to the dentin surface. Thirty-five human third molars were flattened to expose the occlusal dentin surface. The teeth were randomly assigned to 7 experimental groups: G1-Single Bond (SB); G2-additional layer of SB; G3--a layer of Scotchbond Multi-purpose (SMP) adhesive applied over SB; G4-Clearfil SE Bond (CE); G5-additional layer of CE; G6-Adper Prompt (AP) and G7-additional layer of AP. For the G2, G3, G5 and G7 groups, the first adhesive layer was light-cured before application of the additional layer. After bonding procedures, 5-mm high composite crowns were incrementally built up. The samples were sectioned to obtain 0.9 x 0.9 beams, which were tested under tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5-mm/minute until failure. The failure mode and adhesive thickness were evaluated under SEM. The pTBS data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and post-hoc Ducan's Test (a=0.05). Mean adhesive thickness was analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's test (a=0.05). The results indicated that G3 presented the highest microTBS and the thickest adhesive layer. G6 and G7 presented the lowest microTBS values. When solvent-free adhesives systems were used, microTBS values were not affected by the thicker layer. | |
dc.description | 31 | |
dc.description | 562-8 | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Operative Dentistry | |
dc.relation | Oper Dent | |
dc.rights | fechado | |
dc.rights | | |
dc.source | PubMed | |
dc.subject | Adhesiveness | |
dc.subject | Adhesives | |
dc.subject | Bisphenol A-glycidyl Methacrylate | |
dc.subject | Composite Resins | |
dc.subject | Dental Bonding | |
dc.subject | Dental Restoration, Permanent | |
dc.subject | Dentin | |
dc.subject | Dentin-bonding Agents | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Materials Testing | |
dc.subject | Microscopy, Electron, Scanning | |
dc.subject | Molar, Third | |
dc.subject | Organophosphates | |
dc.subject | Resin Cements | |
dc.subject | Stress, Mechanical | |
dc.subject | Surface Properties | |
dc.subject | Tensile Strength | |
dc.title | Influence Of Additional Adhesive Application On The Microtensile Bond Strength Of Adhesive Systems. | |
dc.type | Artículos de revistas | |