[full Threshold Vs. Sita In Glaucomatous Patients Undergoing Automated Perimetry For The First Time].

dc.creatorSchimiti, Rui Barroso
dc.creatorArcieri, Enyr Saran
dc.creatorArciery, Enyr Saran
dc.creatorAvelino, Rodrigo Rezende
dc.creatorMatsuo, Tiemi
dc.creatorCosta, Vital Paulino
dc.date
dc.date2015-11-27T13:05:26Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:05:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:02:47Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:02:47Z
dc.identifierArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia. v. 69, n. 2, p. 145-50
dc.identifier0004-2749
dc.identifier/S0004-27492006000200002
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699660
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/196764
dc.identifier16699660
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1296997
dc.descriptionTo compare the Full Threshold (FT) and SITA Standard (SS) strategies in glaucomatous patients undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. Thirty-one glaucomatous patients who had never undergone perimetry underwent automated perimetry (Humphrey, program 30-2) with both FT and SS on the same day, with an interval of at least 15 minutes. The order of the examination was randomized, and only one eye per patient was analyzed. Three analyses were performed: a) all the examinations, regardless of the order of application; b) only the first examinations; c) only the second examinations. In order to calculate the sensitivity of both strategies, the following criteria were used to define abnormality: glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) outside normal limits, pattern standard deviation (PSD) <5%, or a cluster of 3 adjacent points with p<5% at the pattern deviation probability plot. When the results of all examinations were analyzed regardless of the order in which they were performed, the number of depressed points with p<0.5% in the pattern deviation probability map was significantly greater with SS (p=0.037), and the sensitivities were 87.1% for SS and 77.4% for FT (p=0.506). When only the first examinations were compared, there were no statistically significant differences regarding the number of depressed points, but the sensitivity of SS (100%) was significantly greater than that obtained with FT (70.6%) (p=0.048). When only the second examinations were compared, there were no statistically significant differences regarding the number of depressed points, and the sensitivities of SS (76.5%) and FT (85.7%) (p=0.664). SS may have a higher sensitivity than FT in glaucomatous patients undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. However, this difference tends to disappear in subsequent examinations.
dc.description69
dc.description145-50
dc.languagepor
dc.relationArquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia
dc.relationArq Bras Oftalmol
dc.rightsaberto
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectChi-square Distribution
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Computer-assisted
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGlaucoma
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectSensitivity And Specificity
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectVisual Field Tests
dc.subjectVisual Fields
dc.title[full Threshold Vs. Sita In Glaucomatous Patients Undergoing Automated Perimetry For The First Time].
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución