Visual Evaluation Of In Vitro Cariostatic Effect Of Restorative Materials Associated With Dentifrices.

dc.creatorRodrigues, José Augusto
dc.creatorMarchi, Giselle Maria
dc.creatorSerra, Mônica Campos
dc.creatorHara, Anderson Takeo
dc.date2005
dc.date2015-11-27T13:02:42Z
dc.date2015-11-27T13:02:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T01:01:58Z
dc.date.available2018-03-29T01:01:58Z
dc.identifierBrazilian Dental Journal. v. 16, n. 2, p. 112-8, 2005.
dc.identifier0103-6440
dc.identifier
dc.identifierhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16475604
dc.identifierhttp://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/196548
dc.identifier16475604
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/1296781
dc.descriptionThis study evaluated in vitro the cariostatic effect of 6 restorative materials with and without fluoride release (Fuji II LC, F-2000, Degufil Mineral, Sure Fil and Z-250) associated with a fluoridated and a non-fluoridated dentifrice (Sensodyne Original Formula and Sensodyne Sodium Bicarbonate), on human enamel. Class V-like cavities were prepared on 240 enamel slabs, assigned to 12 groups (6 materials and 2 dentifrices). After cavity restoration, the slabs were submitted to a thermocycling regimen of 1000 thermal cycles and demineralization/remineralization cycles. During pH cycles, slurries of fluoridated and non-fluoridated dentifrices were applied for 5 min. Formation of artificial caries-like lesions was scored independently and blindly by 5 calibrated examiners according to an ordinal scale ranked 0 to 3 by visual examination. The results were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test and pair-wise comparisons (alpha=0.05). There were no significant differences (p>0.05) among the restorative materials associated with the fluoridated dentifrice. When used in association with the non-fluoridated dentifrice, Ketac-Fil showed the highest cariostatic effect followed by Fuji II LC and the other materials. Ketac-Fil was the only material that did not differ statistically when combined with either the fluoridated or the non-fluoridated dentifrice. In conclusion, under the tested experimental conditions, the association of restorative materials and fluoridated dentifrice yielded higher cariostatic effect, except for the conventional glass ionomer cement, whose cariostatic effect was not influenced by the type of dentifrice.
dc.description16
dc.description112-8
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.relationBraz Dent J
dc.rightsaberto
dc.rights
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectBisphenol A-glycidyl Methacrylate
dc.subjectCariostatic Agents
dc.subjectCompomers
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Cavity Preparation
dc.subjectDental Cements
dc.subjectDental Enamel
dc.subjectDental Materials
dc.subjectDental Restoration, Permanent
dc.subjectDentifrices
dc.subjectDiffusion
dc.subjectDrug Combinations
dc.subjectEthanol
dc.subjectFluorides
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cements
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHydrogen-ion Concentration
dc.subjectMaleates
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethacrylates
dc.subjectNitrates
dc.subjectPhosphates
dc.subjectPolymethacrylic Acids
dc.subjectResins, Synthetic
dc.subjectSingle-blind Method
dc.subjectTooth Demineralization
dc.subjectTooth Remineralization
dc.titleVisual Evaluation Of In Vitro Cariostatic Effect Of Restorative Materials Associated With Dentifrices.
dc.typeArtículos de revistas


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución